Tell you what Mick, you know that is going to take forever to explain to you, as you have taken an anti-Whyte stance. Whether you 'like' him or don't like 'him' that much is true. I'm off to work now, and I'll give you my response tonight. p.s. I'm on Japan time btw.
Can't agree with your statement on matter of if Fury edges the champion Usyk as then Fury will be undisputed champion, any naysayers then regarding Fury would most definitely be spouting nonsense. Any other fighter he defends against as champ is and will be open to debate and criticism, that is the norm with many match ups across all champions. With regard to him facing AJ, frankly if the AJ of the Usyk fight were to be facing even the Fury of Wilder 3 it would not even be competitive, Fury would wipe the floor with AJ. I hope Fury will face Whyte, firstly as he is mandatory challenger (if authorities have mandatory challengers then i feel it should be honoured or else don't have them) and secondly i think Whyte would present a live challenge from outset, and make a decent bout for as long as it lasted until Fury prevailed. Ah sod it i will join in and jump on the Fury criticism bandwagon, he only fights shorter fighters than himself, all those taller fighters he could face yet refuses.......
He was ordered to fight brezeale and turned it down. Kicking and screaming the whole way. Tried to dictate to the Wbc who the mandatory was. Blew his chance. Been badly managed has Whyte
I know what you said. I asked when it happened. Then I can find it and read it after work. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. But to my knowledge, and I've tried to find what you are talking about, Whyte has never refused a fight against Breazeale when they were both trying to become mandatory for the WBC title. So can I ask when this happened?
https://britishboxingnews.co.uk/blogs/wbc-order-dillian-whyte-and-dominic-breazeale quick google search cheif
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....-left-out-in-the-cold-in-the-wbc-division?amp Part of this article states that the wbc wanted Whyte to fight Ortiz but he fought Parker instead, blatant duck imo
Honestly, how people expect you to sit through a 12 minute video is a joke. I will not watch a video that needs timestamps bit doesn't have them. Eff that!
On thing at a time, matey. I'll give you likes for the effort. But I just read all four of your articles. None of them mentioned Whyte ducking Breazeale... In the fourth article for all its inaccuracies/selective omissions it does at least state that Whyte wanted a guarantee from the WBC that if he beat Ortiz he'd get a title shot. When they refused, so did he. Seems fair enough really. What was new information for me though, is I understood it was for the second mandatory position, but that article suggests it wasn't even a guaranteed second mandatory position! Cheers you are making the case against the WBC even stronger, I'll make sure to bring this up to @Mickc later today. But let's not get side tracked by that. From those four articles there is nothing about Whyte ducking Breazeale. Actually as I recall that ordered fight was pretty much agreed, neither Breazeale or Whyte pulled themselves out... 5th times a charm? p.s. I noticed all of those articles got parts of the timeline wrong. Journalists nowadays! It's almost like the access media aren't to be trusted
@teddybaldock But wait?! What is this? It's can't be... Dominic Breazeale ducking Dillian Whyte to make an eliminator against Molina with the WBC's blessing? Say it isn't so! https://www.*******.com/breazeale-offer-face-dillian-whyte-far-from-substantial--121357 Replace the stars with www. boxing scene . com No spaces
Aye he ducked Whyte to face wilder( how that’s ever considered a duck is a mystery to me) Whyte could’ve faced Ortiz in 2018 to become mandatory and chose to fight paint dry Parker for the Ppv money instead. After wilder v brezeale Whyte had the whole ped thing going, and then fought Marius Wach about 3 stone over weight and looked dog, then got starched by povetkin. Whyte is food for fury. Hope it happens just to end the myth. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....n-to-fight-eric-molina-over-dillian-whyte?amp Also says straight from the horses mouth here than Hearn lowballed them.
He definitely did not fight a world title eliminator in 2016. Don't listen to that bollocks from Hearn and Whyte. In 2016 he fought Ian Lewison, Ivica Bacurin, Dave Allen and Chisora. His first and only world title eliminator was in 2019 against Takam. To date he's turned down WBC eliminators in 2018 against Ortiz and 2019 against Breazeale, an IBF eliminator against Pulev in 2017 and a world title fight against Joshua in 2019. In all 3 final eliminators he turned down, the opponent fought someone else and went on to fight the champion immediately apart from Pulev who got injured 2 weeks before his schedule fight with Joshua but eventually fought him anyway. He's had 4 chances to fight for a world title.
Nope, he ducked Whyte to fight Molina... I never mentioned Wilder. Sorry. And No one believes Breazeale got paid more to fight Molina than he was offered to fight Whyte. Plus unlike Molina who Sulaiman said himself would not be mandatory if he beat Breazeale because he hadn't gone through the appropriate steps. I.e. winning an eliminator. But Guess who had won an eliminator in 2016, and was trying to make the fight with Breazeale: Dillian m'fking Whyte Pure corruption by the WBC So... I've already Completely shot holes through your arguments. I don't need to repeat everything again. ...i think this is where you acknowledge you were wrong... But it's nice that we agree on one thing: Fury beats Whyte. Glad you are looking forward to it.
A lot of people all in their feelings when it comes to Whyte, I see. Multiple news sights reported it before and after the fight. Sorry... Whyte v Chisora 1 was a WBC eliminator in December 2016 https://www.boxingnews24.com/2016/12/dillian-whyte-vs-dereck-chisora-on-saturday/ https://www.*****.net/2016/12/08/whyte-v-chisora-on-remains-wbc-eliminator-as-bbbofc-pull-title/ https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/38278399 Anything to disprove this? If I am wrong on this, I will hold my hands up