He might go full George Foreman and end up Street Preaching at this rate, quit for a decade then come back fat as **** trying to win the belts, only thing is Fury will come back fatter with the Lean , Mean, Wild Boar Grilling machine contract tied up and still lay him out. Stay Humble AJ, Stay Humble
Difference is they had a ref who allowed Parker to get near them. That AJ v Parker fight was a farce.
Grossly overrated and a complete scammer in conjunction with Eh Day Earn. As the great man would say - 'never has one, so mediocre, extracted so much PPV loot, from so many'
Not one question about where Joshua's future lies in terms of a TV deal but plenty of detail about the hat he is wearing. We even know the colours he got and 'the boys' helping themselves to some too. These 1 hour 'raw' interviews are ground breaking stuff.
Parker bout not a very good example. It was an absolute stinker of a bout that the great Richard Dwyer had Paint Dry winning.
Fury went through a stage of deleting all the photos off his account too. Does Joshua mention the Instagram thing in the interview? Haven't watched it all.
Can't believe I've just sat through the whole thing. He's still the p4p King of talking a lot while saying nothing. Do you understand what I'm saying? No mention of the IG purge. He sounds like he's going to adopt a Chisora esque approach Vs Usyk in the rematch, take it to him and make it physical. We'll see how that goes.
They don't though. Way more stock gets put into Tysons wins over Cunningham, Chisora and Wallin. Wallin is an utterly nobody at HW. Yet he was handling Tyson with ease at times. Chisora has always been terrible, he's just a better version of Dave Allen. Molina? That's a nothing win. Same for Breazale. Takam is a decent win. Those wins means nothing to me.
It looked like AJ forgot he was playing after a few seconds, and just started to summarise some of the same random thoughts he had already covered in the interview then reverted to his early teens fantasising about being an American gangster. All in a desperate effort to psyche himself into believing he can pulverize Usyk and regain his shattered self esteem. He seems confused.
Is that how it works? So Chisora getting knocked the **** out vs Whyte and going life and death twice while AJ knocks Whyte out means what exactly? Chisora losing to Pulev, Kabayel, Parker means very little difference between him and AJ? Whyte getting Knocked the **** out by Povetkin while AJ took him out means not much difference between them? Whyte going life and death vs Parker while AJ wins a comfortable decision means what? There is no metric which one can justify the argument of Chisora and Whyte being on the same level as AJ.
Wallin will probably end up being better than Breazeale, Chisora, Takam and Martin - however good he ends up being. Takam hasn't beaten anybody decent in his career and he's 41. His best wins are against very old guys like Botha and Thompson. Therefore what makes Joshua's record better than Fury's? Wins over Parker, Povetkin, Ruiz and Pulev? That's laughable. He also had two losses, one of which is an affront and that needs to be considered.
