Mike Tyson vs Joe Frazier

Tyson, all day, every day. In 3 rounds tops.

 

I'd bet my house on it.

 

you got it longer then me I say 1st round sense joe has no way to stop being hit and known to be hurt by sudden counter shots bad they do him the worst like you see I said shown by oscar

 

I dont know why he wouldnt bet Its a guarantee joe would lose

 

If Tyson hurts Frazier, it's all over. Tyson by KO in under 3 rounds.

Simply, Tyson can do it far quicker cause he's way more accurate.

Tyson was not prepared one bit for that fight.

Complete horse****. Ali is tailor made for Tyson.

Simple, he walks all over poor ol' Frazier.

Good joke. Quarry gets beat by Tucker, Ruddock, old Holmes, Spinks, Bruno, Tubbs etc

Tyson is more than capable of taking out Frazier early. Once he has him hurt, that's all she wrote.

Tyson doesn't need to, he'll love the fact that Frazier is coming to him. It would be like an antelope going towards a lion.

Complete and utter crap, just another stupid unsubstantiated MYTH.
Did Frazier fight harder when Foreman was bouncing him around like a bowling ball ?!
The answer is a big fat NOOOOOO !!!

No, it's a FACT. Tyson will go through him like a hot knife through butter.

Bull****. Apart from Ali, Tyson beat better opposition.

No, it's just ignorance on your part. Tyson is stronger, faster, has 2 good punching hands, has a wider variety of punches, far better combos, better chin, better defense. He is superior in every possible way.

Only in your dreams. In real life, Tyson KOs Frazier in under 3 rounds.

 

Tyson KO

 

son is a legend troll it's obvious the stuff he saying wouldn't work for the best mike when oscar had joe down and almost ended from the 1st drop and oscar wasnt close to the power that mike had and son lied saying mike just gave up when he was hurt

I just seen pinklon rock mike the first strong right 1st round which would have put a person in danger mike took that shot real good he didnt even stumble he knew he got caught though

same with razor hit mike mutiple times mike never was in danger mike shown he was way tougher for taking shots then joe ever did

 

never understood why people say that dumb quote of joe wouldnt stop coming that never was a good idea with mike it always was best to keep range and stop him from landing shots joe didnt fight like that so why would it be a good idea to keep moving forward

and why was it said that if George couldnt do it when George tech was trash which is the reason joe kept getting back up and joe could take his punches better but when oscar dropped joe he was hurt way more and stuggled more to get up from the 1st drop and was almost ended there

never understood why people say it George couldnt do it then mike couldnt well logic would say when looking at George tech and being so slow should say it's the reason George always took mutiple punches to drop or stop a person when people weaker then him with better tech got the stoppage faster or ko

joe being dropped by George never stuggled that much to get up from George drops

 

He opened yet ANOTHER thread that had been dead for days. This guy needs to start a Mike Tyson Cathedral.

A lot of people don't agree with you son. Live with it.

What am I doing, this guy is the biggest troll here. We can't lose him, this place wouldn't be half as amusing.

 

Foreman is entirely different than Tyson. Foreman also was a pusher which I have always contended he should have been warned for (watch the tape of the fight). Foreman is much stronger and bigger than Tyson. If Tyson could be pushed around by Holyfield. I think Frazier can back him up to. And Tyson can not fight backing up. Lastly a lot is said about the Tyson uppercut hurting Frazier but if it was this simple why was no one but Foreman about to do it? Partly because if you start an uppercut you leave yourself open for a hook.