Send In The Great White Hope..?

Dempsey and Coetzee are the most likely to land something at range imho. Dempsey better p4p but Coetzee has some serious size to him. Botha would have been difficult for JJ in another sense, namely that he himself was a wrestling mauling type of fighter and was also bigger than JJ. I think any of these three would have had a good chance.

 

Johnson said Dempsey was a, "great four round fighter, "after that he was pretty ordinary.I get his point ,but I'm not convinced!

 

Might as well match him against Schmeling and get Don King to co-promote for maximum riots.

 

Jean Pierre Coopmans "Lion of Flounders"
LEADING MUHAMMAD ALI 40-36 (10 POINT MUST)
was stopped on national television by a desprate Ali
Ropes were loose and a victim of a fast count!

 

Those who know the gloves.

Conn, Dempsey, Shakey ect.

Jack Dempsey would bring down the hammer for my money.

 

Forgetting the color of their skin, of the group you mentioned, Dempsey is the one guy with enough class and championship aggressiveness and bravado to beat Johnson.

 

Can I pick that Giant from Kansas?

 

That's cheating.

 

Someone deleted my Louis thread. Wow. Bizarre choice.

 

Seriously, though, there are two potential answers.

If you buy into the school of thought that boxing in Johnson's day was a genuinely different sport with a decent talent pool, then you'd pick the early guys. Dempsey is the best bet.

If, however, you believe that athletes in Johnson's era just plain sucked, then you'd want to pick modern guys. The less impressed you are by the athletic talent pool and boxing environment that produced Johnson, the better you'll like the chances of guys who fought in the highly competitive 60s/70s/80s divisions like Coetzee and Quarry. (Or Botha, if you also happen to place a lot of emphasis on how much PEDs changed the game.)

 

I frankly wouldn't favor any of them to be honest. Dempsey has the best chance,