Foreman vs a slightly better Foreman

He's certainly slightly better at doing so than regular Foreman

 

First off, kudos for being the first person to ask.

My slightly more serious answer is: If other forum arguments can largely avoid stylistic analysis by simply noting that Fighter X beats Fighter Y because Fighter X was "better" (being a champion, occupying a higher Ring ranking more consistently, etc.), then this question should be easily answerable without any further details.

 

It's partly to be silly, and partly to gently nudge people to do more stylistic breakdowns.

But mostly it's to be silly.