A sensitive topic: Ring fatalities from punchers and non-punchers

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Nov 7, 2021.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,033
    Jun 30, 2005
    I worry a bit that this is an unpleasant topic, but you sometimes see people talking about deaths in the ring as evidence of punching power, so I figured it ought to be addressed.

    In discussions of punchers' abilities, ring fatalities like the ones that happened against Max Baer, or Bob Fitzsimmons, are sometimes quoted to show how hard these men hit. Since these are claims about boxing, I suppose they can be explored, although I think this should be done as respectfully as possible.

    As for me, I'm not sure there's the strong connection that others assume. Yes, a fighter's punching power probably puts opponents at greater risk of serious injury or death than otherwise. See what happened to Gerald McClellan, for example. But I think the poor conditions in the early 20th century -- medical, regulatory, social, and in terms of rules -- were likely much greater contributors to fatalities than (say) Bob Fitzsimmons being an unparalleled puncher. Let alone somebody like Carnera. Most boxing pundits wouldn't claim that punching power among heavyweights from the 1970s or 80s was significantly worse than in the 30s, but you don't see any tragedies on Foreman's record, or Shavers's.

    In short, I don't think ring deaths prove much about relative punching power. They do not merit the emphasis sometimes given in "Who punched harder?" threads, since they're more useful in charting advances in regulation and medical aid than punching power. They seem to be unlucky tragedies more than solid data points about fighter performance.
     
  2. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,424
    Aug 22, 2004
    Griffith wasn't a great puncher, nor was Albert Davila. Nor, for that matter, was Gabe Ruelas.

    What these fights (and most others) have in common is sustained punishment over a number of rounds. Power punchers can take guys out much quicker. Ergo, they take less punishment.
     
  3. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,033
    Jun 30, 2005
    Agreed. Notice also that the turn of the century boxers fought very long, mauling bouts with small gloves, which they trained for by dehydrating themselves.
     
  4. William Walker

    William Walker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,901
    9,151
    Apr 9, 2020
    Good points. And perhaps guys taken out early by bigger punchers have better health than those gradually chopped down by lighter punchers.
     
  5. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    Not all ring deaths are about power. On any giving day a good punch can kill a man if landed right. Fitz, Baer ete hit hard, and do have the power to knock a man out or even kill them if the situation falls into that outcome should it come to that, they can in theory be able kill a man should they land the shot right, but that does not mean there going to cause fatalities like it is Mortal Kombat or something. On the other hand the punch that Carnera killed Schaaf with does not look like much. Any time a blow hits you, there is always risk of death. It is just the way the human body is. We are not made to take shots to the head with out some type of damage.
     
  6. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 Full Member

    19,057
    21,102
    Sep 22, 2021
    Anyone that uses Baers body count as an example of power disgusts me. Complete lack of respect and human decency. As stated Griffith above really wasn't a puncher It was simply a matter of dehydration and an accumulation of damage that took Benny Paret from us. You wouldn't believe the ****s I have seen say Benny deserved it for calling Griff a "Maricon" like trash talk never happens grow up. Boxers put there lives on the line every single time they go out there and they make there money fighting for your amusement just to be ****ed in the end 95% of the time. Don't call yourself a fan or a man if you are going to trivialize what goes on in that ring. /Rant over :lol:/
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2021
    cross_trainer likes this.
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,588
    27,252
    Feb 15, 2006
    Dehydration is probably the biggest factor for in ring fatalities.

    Outside the ring it usually happens when somebody hits their head on the floor.
     
    Journeyman92 and cross_trainer like this.
  8. Rope-a-Dope

    Rope-a-Dope Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,138
    7,974
    Jan 20, 2015
    Exactly. Davila was the first one I thought of. One punch from George Foreman might knock you down for the count, but 500 punches from Albert Davila will do way more damage to your brain.
     
  9. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Kid Lavigne stated Andy Bowen asked for the padding on the ring to be removed and that lead to his death in their fight.
     
    louis54 and Journeyman92 like this.
  10. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,033
    Jun 30, 2005
    Yeah, I haven't encountered many people who actively gloat over ring deaths as "deserved"...but holy crap. If someone does, that's pretty disgusting.

    On the other issue,, though, I wouldn't say that people who think ring fatalities = punching power are necessarily trivializing the risks (unless they view deaths as notches on a belt, which would indeed be ****ed up.) It's a medical issue more than anything. I don't think it's an unreasonable theory at first inspection to assume that absorbing really hard punches might put someone at great risk of serious injury or worse....it's just that the facts don't seem to bear out the connection.

    That said: Even if it were true that punchers tend to cause more ring fatalities, it wouldn't be something to brag about, which is the point I think you're making.

    EDIT: Bizarrely, the most prominent recent example of the "notches on the belt" outlook is a boxer himself: Deontay "I Want A Body On My Record" Wilder. But he may be trash talking for the fans. Considering how killing people in the ring seems to mess boxers' psyches up historically, he should hope even for his own sake that he never gets his wish.
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2021
    Journeyman92 and Bukkake like this.
  11. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,497
    7,263
    May 18, 2006
    Hector Thompson had two ring fatalities at his hands. He was a solid, attrition puncher but certainly not a noted KO artist.

    It definitely adds credence to the “attrition” puncher being more debilitating long term than the noted power puncher.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,535
    83,350
    Nov 30, 2006
    Accumulation is always worse than a single powerful blow, of course - but accumulation of powerful blows from a hard puncher is worse than a comparable number from a pillow-fist. Seems fairly straightforward logic.

    I do agree that citing them as supporting arguments when parsing out a ranked hierarchy of punchers is, tasteless aside, not the most instructive or useful tool given how many other factors can play into such tragedies.
     
  13. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,376
    12,717
    Mar 2, 2006
    IMO, the WBC needs to shoulder the blame for the Jimmy Garcia and Kiko Bejienes debacles. It is a rough sport and tragedies do happen, but bad matches due to politics and money changing hands are a big cause. For instance, when a fighter is getting a shot at the title - and I am a stickler with this - he should be deserving and in shape for the biggest moment of his professional career. Not some clubfighter from a politically connected country. In the instance of Garcia, he had a pretty record, but in what way was he deserving of a title shot? Very few names of substance on his record, he hadn't won a fight in almost a year and in his last fight he was absolutely and soundly beaten by Genero Hernandez for the WBA title. Now, Hernandez wasn't a puncher, which was probably lucky for Garcia. But to put in a completely undeserving fighter like that with a tiger like Ruelas was quite literally, tragic. Secondly, Kiko Bejines hadn't even fought in 13 months - and that was a 4th round stoppage loss - when he went into the fight with Albert Davila for the vacant bantamweight title. A vacant title is supposed to be between the two top contenders. How the hell did Bejienes still hold a top 2 rating? Again, when one is fighting for the world championship, this cannot be taken lightly and the contender needs to be ready not politically ready.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  14. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,622
    8,598
    Sep 19, 2021
    I've thought this. Someone like a Larry Holmes has probably done a lot more long term damage to people than an Earnie Shavers. If Shavers got you, it was one punch. If Larry got you, it was 100 stiff jabs to the head with some straight rights to the head following up on those.
     
    young griffo and cross_trainer like this.
  15. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,635
    36,212
    Jan 8, 2017
    McGuigan and Bugner hsd to live with the pain of causing a death in the ring. As did Alan Minter.
    Of course, Eubank had the tragic Michael Watson fight, but by the grace of God he survived.
    Every time a fighter steps in the ring, he's literally taking his and his opponent life in to his hands.