Psychologically weak elite fighters from the 1920s - 1950s?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Nov 9, 2021.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    Obviously, professional fighters are much stronger mentally than the average person (or poster.) Always have been.

    But some pros are more resilient than others.

    Which contenders from the 1920s thru 1950s Golden Age of boxing would you categorize as showing symptoms of (relative) psychological weakness: inconsistent performances, a tendency to give up in adversity, refusal to engage, fouling out, passivity in the ring, and so on?

    BONUS: How common were such issues back then, compared to today?
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  2. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 banned Full Member

    19,057
    21,094
    Sep 22, 2021
    This’ll be interesting. Usually this thread (with a later date) becomes the Mike Tyson psyche evaluation thread. I’m not going to assume any fighter is mentally weak at the highest level to do so would be a load of meaningless nothing on my part or anyone else’s here.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  3. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 banned Full Member

    19,057
    21,094
    Sep 22, 2021
    Though I will add inconsistent performances, self preservation and passivity could also be a matter of the times. You’ll probably fight this guy next month anyway and your shoulders damaged just don’t get counted out- maybe you want a rematch so you take this young up and comer a few extra rounds and make it competitive- give him a name so the gate for the rematch is bigger ect.

    In Muay Thai it’s a common thing for fighters not to attempt to finish one another, At the lower levels of the sport it is beneficial for both parties involved they know the person they’re fighting might need to fight next week and if they turn up the heat one of them could get cut/injured and be taken out of commission old school boxing has a lot in common with the way Muay Thai is conducted.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  4. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    It's inspired by arguments by old trainers and fighters interviewed in "The Arc of Boxing," who claimed that you see greater fragility from modern fighters than 20s-50s ones. Some of those guys were experienced coaches and athletes, who did believe that some top contenders could come apart due to mental weakness.

    I'm curious whether the kind of example-digging used to make that case can be done backwards in time.

    In more modern times, we have at least a couple; Golota is a spectacular example, so I don't think it's implausible that there were Golotas back then.
     
    louis54 and Journeyman92 like this.
  5. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    For what it's worth, James Loehr was a sports psychologist who worked with Ray Mancini, and FWIR, his take was that psychological factors can play a role in performance even among contenders of Mancini's level.

    On the other hand, Loehr had an incentive to say that, since it's what Mancini paid him to fix.

    On the other other hand, Mancini apparently found it necessary to hire a sports psychologist in the first place. So he must have seen some value in it.
     
  6. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 banned Full Member

    19,057
    21,094
    Sep 22, 2021
    I wouldn't call him mentally weak in the conventual sense he obviously had serious mental issues.

    I suppose you could argue that the 20s-50s guys were bred in a tougher era and fought so often it was "comfortable"

    This could contribute to why they were mentally tougher, or maybe at peace? think about it you lose now you hang your head in shame for a long while and may not get a rematch.

    Back then a loss was just the "norm" it wasn't a grand thing you knew you'd probably get another shot and if you lost you'd be excused it sounds a lot less stressful to me in some ways.
     
    Brixton Bomber and cross_trainer like this.
  7. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    Yeah, I'm using weakness in the broad sense that the Arc of Boxing used it. Basically psychological factors that lead you to make poor decisions / underperform due to pressure and stress. Golota's psychological issues would fit that broad description, IMO.

    I agree that Golota clearly wasn't a coward. He didn't run out of the ring crying or anything. (McCall's meltdown, where he did in fact cry, is another example. Again, his performance deteriorated under pressure, but he wasn't exactly running away. Just the opposite!)
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  8. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    One other note: I agree with your MT example, and also agree with this. Comfort in the ring, and experience facing that kind of pressure, is exactly right. That's what the old timey coaches and fighters were claiming that the environment of the Golden Age produced, although thus far there's no attempt to parallel the MT scene despite the obvious similarities.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  9. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,575
    17,653
    Apr 3, 2012
  10. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    If we're talking about old-timers with the "Golota syndrome", then George Godfrey comes to mind! He got himself DQ'd 9 times - and you have to wonder, how many of these were on purpose?

    As for refusal to engage/passivity, that seems to have been quite common back in the 20s, during the ND days. Someone like Godfrey was (in addition to the DQs) thrown out (together with his opponent) no less than 4 times because of "stalling". These fights were in effect double disqualifications, but are listed as NCs.

    Other well known boxers from that time, who were involved in fights that were stopped, because of passivity, include future HOFers like Tunney, Wills, Berlenbach, Stribling, Delaney, Slattery, Rosenbloom, Walker, Shade, Britton... plus lots and lots of lesser known boxers.
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2021
    Journeyman92 and cross_trainer like this.
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    Please elaborate. Intrigued, I am.
     
  12. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    If, for example, we want to examine, how often a fight ended in a DQ back in the 20s, compared to today - then we must find two years, where BoxRec lists approx. the same number of fights.

    If we take 2019 (last full year before Covid), we find 30,900 fights in their database. A comparable year back in the 20s would be 1925, where they have 30,709 fights listed. So pretty much the same number of fights.

    In 2019 they have 105 fights ending in a DQ - whereas the number for 1925 is 838. So the DQ frequency was about 8 times higher in 1925, than in 2019.
     
    Journeyman92 and Tomatron like this.
  13. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,040
    4,974
    Mar 26, 2011
    If being contenders makes them "elite",Bombadier Billy Wells,Phil Scott,Jack Sharkey,Jack Doyle,PO Curran.
     
    Fergy and cross_trainer like this.
  14. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Floyd Patterson maybe or was he a bit later.
     
  15. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    That is a very interesting stat. However, one consideration gives me pause specifically on the context of our thread:

    The confounding factor with DQ frequency as a raw statistic for the entire population of fighters is that this was also a period of corruption and fixed fights, where the DQ was one method used to ensure the preferred result. If we want to look at contender psychological issues, we might need to examine fights on an individual basis for their context, at least specifically for DQ results.