Rethinking GGG's Legacy ..

I fully agree with you, Derevyachenko and Jacobs were much closer to beating GGG than Canelo.
I thought the KD made the difference in the Jacobs fight and the derevyachenko fight was a 50/50.
I watched it twice and I couldn't split them, if not for the KD then Derevyachenko would definitely take it for me

 

whatever

You can continue with "castillo beat mayweather", "maydana won to mayweather" and "lara won to canelo"... so that you have the full pack. The full pack of the guys who either have not watched the fight, either have not scored them or either have no clue about how to ****ing score a fight. I wont argue anymore, I'm tired of so much BS. As much as you, clueless people, repeat those fights are robberies, they are not and they declared the right victor in each and every one of them.

Have a nice day

EDIT: and btw, both, jacobs and derevyanchenko, were more of a robbery than the victory that canelo got vs gg, which was close but clear. Derevyanchenko specially was a blatant shameful and disgusting robbery. Nobody says **** about that. And that takiing into account that the only living bodies that gg has ever fought are those 3, the rest are ****ing useless tomatos.

 

Maidana didn't beat Mayweather, Castillo, you can argue beat an injured Mayweather and Mayweather beat both with a lot of ease in rematches. I'm not a Mayweather hater, I'm a huge fan of his boxing style. I'm just not a fan of Canelo who is the recipient of many gifts and his PED use is just swept under a rug.

I don't know where u get the Mayweather stuff from, this is about Canelo

 

Derevyachenko was a disgusting robbery? Then surely you must think both GGG v Canelo fights were disgusting robberies. Derevyachenko probably edged it but come on man, disgusting robbery...
There is no point arguing, we obviously have very different opinions

https://www.eyeonthering.com/boxing/gennady-golovkin-vs-sergiy-derevyanchenko

https://eyeonthering.com/boxing/gennady-golovkin-vs-saul-alvarez-ii

This aligns exactly with what people on here think, about 70% had GGG winning the 2nd Canelo fight and around 50% had GGG win the Derevyachenko fight. Which one is a more disgusting robbery?

 

Keep up dopey...can see how he gets his facts so badly wrong.... pay attention ...alt...

 

He was a legitimate world champion...but i guess its Ok for canelo to chase the hard guys like Fielding dummy..

 

While previously Sturms handlers made sure GGG was blocked from fighting Sturm ...so G man came to dominate the middleweights in USA & UK...

 

Chacal, why did Canelo avoid his mando fight against Derevyachenko ...?

 

Bull****. In your bubble maybe. And of course on esb, which is it’s own bubble. But all the real boxing heads I know, not the casuals or fanboys, have Canelo winning the 2nd fight. They are split on the first one, but not the second.
That’s just how it is and how history is recording it and will continue to do so. Feelings don’t change that.

 

Its the other way around, most Casuals had Canelo winning because MEXICAN STYLE

 

He vacated his belt rather than fight Derevyanchenko, thats why GGG and Derevyanchenko got to fight for the vacant title.

 

Yeah, that’s why he’s the biggest star in the sport and the consensus #1. Because everyone knows he couldn’t beat ggg, lol. Nobody is even interested in a ggg fight anymore, and you think it’s cause ggg beat him?

 

Ring side media had it at least 30 for GGG, 15 a draw, and 2 for Canelo. Just to get you back in proper Calibration.

 

If you can hang with GGG for 24 rounds, whether you really won or not, you are head and shoulders above the rest. Thats how good GGG is. At least 3 years ago.

 

The "story of the fight" crew, they were so proud Canelo didn't run this time.