On this board. Even then they can't be many if they exist at all. I think I saw recently a poster saying that he thought Ramirez deserved the win over Whitaker. Quite a few think Trinidad correctly was given the decision over DLH. And there are those, I think, who have said here that Toney's win over Tiberi was legit. I don't think I've seen anyone defend the verdict for Holy-Lewis I, though. Am I correct and are there other ones?
Yes, the first Holyfield-Lewis verdict has been defended on this board. I've never seen Tiberi's decision over Toney defended though, and I've been in the weeds on that one. What about De La Hoya-Sturm? And I've never seen anyone defend Joel Casamayor-Jose Santa Cruz
I think I speak for a lot of people when I say that I have little desire to watch Sturm--DLH again. I didn't think it was that bad when I watched it and Lederman only had Sturm by a round. I can't remember if I actually scored it or even caught all twelve round though.
