If Tyson had fought in the 60s and 70s, would he have ever won a world title?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Jul 31, 2019.


  1. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,016
    3,806
    Nov 13, 2010
    Although I don't agree with your theory, you do make a great argument.

    Regarding Spinks, the Jinx wasn't too active and taking fights based on highest payouts. Because he didn't fight 3 times a year doesn't mean he wasn't ready or ill prepared.

    Regarding Holmes, he wouldn't take a fight if he wasn't prepared. Larry Holmes is his own biggest fan and would never, ever ever ever ever ever take a fight he didn't believe he'd win.

    Again, good arguments on your part and I do agree to a certain extent.
     
    NoNeck and choklab like this.
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,672
    7,633
    Dec 31, 2009
    I think Spinks was a great win in that Tyson certainly did nothing wrong. He took care of business in the highest profile fight that could have been made at that point. I mean it doesn’t just apply to Tyson. Braddock was inactive going against Louis and still put up a hell of a fight so Tyson does deserve this as a signature win….but only so far as the Braddock win for Louis was.. or Jeffries win for Johnson, Dempsey win for Tunney kind of thing.

    Yes but have you read what Larry wrote in his book about it? He says he fancied his chances, talked himself into it, but recognised he had made a terrible mistake as he stood waiting for the bell to ring. That’s only when it hit him. Larry said it was the one time he was frightened in the ring. He knew then he wasn’t able to do Himself justice. Holmes had let the money talk.
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2021
    Sangria likes this.
  3. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,016
    3,806
    Nov 13, 2010
    I love Larry Holmes. He's my 2nd favorite HW after Evander Holyfield. Against Tyson you could tell when he stepped in that squared circle he didn't look too happy. If he could've prepared better for Tyson (not sure fighting cans would prepare him any better) I'm still convinced he gets steamrolled in 1988.

    Good post.
     
    moneytheman12 and choklab like this.
  4. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,544
    May 4, 2017
    Using the ring? He wasn`t doing anything Walcott moved far smarter.
     
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,544
    May 4, 2017
    Bowe had slow feet and was being out-boxed by Hide before his power saved him, he was also bad at slipping shots compared to Louis which wa why he got hit so much, he also didn`t move his head after punching which meant he was easier to counter than Louis.
     
  6. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,544
    May 4, 2017
    0:40 no head movement 0:50, 1:23 so open and sluggish. 5:52
     
  7. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,780
    878
    Feb 4, 2021
    agian I say stop picking certain moments cause that doesn't work with me when I talk in general which can go for upper or lower body movement and agian your doing the slow feet movement why when I already proved bowe upperbody movement was way more advanced u left that out I see

    im saying agian louis could dodge shots easier cause look at how they fought so basic stiff lack of movement I did agree to that for that reason only

    louis wouldnt be able to dodge the same people bowe fought he would struggle to land
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2021
  8. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,780
    878
    Feb 4, 2021
    I thought we was comparing joe only I said more then once jersey was the best mover ever in the black and white era before the ali era I argee with him using the ring over Bowe better

    I don't argee to Louis using the ring better then bowe though my mind wont change on that
     
  9. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,780
    878
    Feb 4, 2021
    your picking spots yea I agree to these spots but still flawed cause I talk in general not certain spots
     
  10. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,591
    11,368
    Mar 23, 2019
    You're arguing with someone who is convinced in his little, erroneous world my friend.
     
    mark ant likes this.
  11. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,544
    May 4, 2017
    A lot of Bowe opponents weren`t that good.
     
  12. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,780
    878
    Feb 4, 2021
    what does that mean to what I said you avoiding by trying to compare something that is no compare the people louis fought was stiff all of them even himself Jersey was the best mover but still stiff in certain upperbody movements

    your point of being not to good is flawed compared to Louis era and before the no names you talk of would all beat the people in Louis era you cant say the same the other way around
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2021
  13. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,780
    878
    Feb 4, 2021
     
  14. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,544
    May 4, 2017
    Louis was a far better combo puncher than Ruddock and Dokes was the only good combo puncher that Ruddock fought, Tyson wa a great combo puncher while Rooney was with him but against Ruddock he mainly threw 1`s and 2`s, Lewis didn`t get many combos off against Ruddock before blowing him out in the second.
     
  15. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,780
    878
    Feb 4, 2021
    louis was better but like I said before look at the people he fought how he fought way easier to pull off fancy combos

    razor had to really work to pull off combos like that on people who really moved around the ring using upperbody movement not people who just stood there using basic stiff movement like Louis era and before

    so when we really look at razor vs his opponents is more impressive
    anybody can look good if they have some good type of training vs basic amateurish type people

    ron ken earnie people who not known to move really great but could throw hard shots ken wasnt know to be a real hard shots these dudes would look the same way as louis had they been in his time
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2021