His resume is completely trash and his fanboys still claim him as p4p king shamelessly. He is not even top 5 in my book. He is f*ckin 34 year old and still his best wins are shot Khan, semi-blind Brook and domestic level Horn. Spence, Porter, Brook all have better resume than the fraud. Porter gonna expose the fraud tonight and you all gonna see.
How anyone can think the Khan and Brook wins are bigger than Postol shows the level of stupidity in the OP
Mighty you are aware this will get bumped if you are proven incorrect. As with most fighters there are fanboys and haters the truth tending to be somwhere in the middle. I personally think Crawford is a little overated certainly at welter as he is untested and doesn't appear to be in a rush to prove he's the best. Maybe the change in management may help him moving forward. The fight with Porter will help clarify further. In short the top dogs need to be fighting each other as atg status is measured on signature wins an example being Wilder who's resume is pathetic for a long reigning belt holder and no Ortiz doesn't count because he has barely fought any big names in the division either. Ali on the other hand has the deepest resume. It's not about winning everything it is about who you fight.
His best win at Welterweight is Horn & that will become Porter tonight - A decently older Porter coming to the end of his career who Spence beat years ago.
He is one of the frauds.. But this extremely hypocritical considering your old pal Clenelo is one of the biggest frauds ever in boxing
I’ve thought this for a while, tonight will tell us where he’s at. Hope Porter wins but you can’t really count out Crawford’s skill and power here