Crawfish is the biggest fraud in boxing.

It's such a good thing that the OP's book means jack **** to me.

 

And return next week under the auspices of an Alt account.

 

For a little perspective here...Teddy Atlas says Crawford is the best IN BOXING HISTORY for 1) instincts and 2) switching from orthodox to southpaw. I have no idea how you can quantify "instincts " but I'm just giving the information out. Don't kill the messenger.

 

Let's not speak on guys best wins being old fighters at the end of their career. You need to hush on the subject of overhyped fighters with bad resumes.

 

No the truth will be told.

 

He doesn't hear very well because Furys balls are stuck in his ears. And his mouth....best not to discuss that orifice.

 

We shall see

 

I think Crawford is a great fighter but it is laughable to include him in the P4P debate given his resume. Postol, Mean Machine, Horn and washed Khan/Brook are solid wins but nothing extraordinary. He needs to crack on now as father time is not on his side; the Porter fight is a good start in that regard

 

Until him and Spence sign **** them both.

A pox on both their houses.

 

I’m really no fan, hoping Porter does a number on him.

 

People who start jerking off Crawford as "P4P1" after he beats Shawn Porter are the problem with boxing.

Porter lacks adaptability to deal with Crawford, I'd be impressed if going to war and trying to outpace Crawford works.

 

Crawford resume at 147 is pure trash, how can anyone rank him #1? He hasn't beat anyone good in like 5 years

 

And just like his fights, nobody noticed