Max Baer V Wlad Klitschko.?

yea why brag on basic sloopy jabs that was straight come forward odd thing to brag on

oh I beat amateurs undefeated so that means I can beat a pro
sounds real idiotic the same way

 

Wlad has the jab and size but a weak chin, Max has the one thing to erase all of Wlad's advantages power. If Corrie Sanders could ice Wlad ,so could Max Baer. I'd make Wlad a 60-40 favorite, with Wlad's chin you can't move the odds more than that

 

What does it even mean?

 

I think he's saying that Max never proved his toughness, because the only people who hit Max didn't know how to "maximize [their] punches."

I have no idea what it means to "maximize punches," though.

 

50/50 ? Are you drunk in the middle of the week ?

Why don´t you just ask if Wlad beats Bear and Carnera on the same night (one after another) ?

 

Me neither.

 

Schmeling?

 

I don't respond to him.

 

This.

 

maximize effectiveness

 

not drunk crazy max has nothing at all to help him

wlad would laugh at the question

 

basic and sloopy the same as max?

 

It was a question along with the other s to the good, sensible people out there..
Ps, I'm absolutely drunk as a skunk.

 

That era lacked good big men. Any from that era having to fight Wlad would present them with an issue.

 

I don't subscribe to the theory that we can tell everything about a fighter by watching YouTube videos. Nor do I think that size trumps many other factors. Personally, I think a prime (best win) Max Baer (around the Schmeling fight?) would beat a prime Wladimir Klitschko (around the Rahman fight?). I wouldn't bet on it, but it's my humble opinion. Make of it what you will...