If Spence and Crawford aren't ATG, how can you say Cotto is?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxingIQ, Nov 25, 2021.


  1. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,047
    946
    Nov 6, 2017
    Ok, hear me out. Cotto's best wins are Margarito, Mosley, Clottey, and Martinez. Now, most of these guys were either past their prime or not as great as they seemed. He couldn't even put Pauli Malignaggi away for Christ's sake. Now, Crawford became undisputed at 140 and actually defeated better competition than Cotto Did. Spence has big wins on Lamont Peterson, A fresher Kell Brook, Porter, and Danny Garcia. When comparing the resumes and skillsets, it is clear as day that Crawford and Spence are better than Cotto and deserve to be Hall of Famers and ATGs. Cotto never rose to the occasion and defeated ATGS in their primes (Manny and Floyd). In my opinion, if you have Cotto as a ATG, you have to have Spence and Crawford there. I would even go as far as to say that Porter is better than anyone Cotto has ever faced. Any thoughts?
     
  2. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    10,917
    9,929
    Oct 1, 2011
    Interesting perspective. How do you think Crawford would do against Cotto @140? No cake walk for Crawford.
     
    Salty Dog likes this.
  3. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,951
    23,894
    Feb 19, 2007
    i never considered cotto an atg.
     
    kriszhao, Jackomano, Bokaj and 11 others like this.
  4. CleneloAnavarez

    CleneloAnavarez Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,795
    1,471
    Nov 18, 2021
    Golovkin had mauled him. Look at Brook's face midway through his fight with Spence.
    Neither have Crawford and Spence.

    Cotto isn't an ATG, neither are Spence and Crawford.
     
  5. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,848
    27,264
    Jul 26, 2004
    Since when is Cotto an ATG.
     
  6. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,848
    27,264
    Jul 26, 2004
    Personally I do think Crawfords too much for Cotto. I think hed get the UD or late stoppage at 140 and 147.
     
  7. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,848
    27,264
    Jul 26, 2004
    I could be tripping, seems Im forgetting more boxing than I can remember these days... but who have they beat that is as good as the Mosley that Cotto beat?

    Not looking to argue it, Im just wondering.

    Off the top of my head, that Mosley is better than anyone theyve beaten.

    (Edit : I see you rank Porter above Mosley. Ya I disagree with that. I think Mosleys better than Porter. But if you think that then I can see a better case for Spence being above Cotto)
     
    JunlongXiFan, KiwiMan, acie2g and 7 others like this.
  8. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    10,917
    9,929
    Oct 1, 2011
    Mosely was damn good. Beat a prime ODH. I Agree no one on TC or ES resume match the Mosely Cotto beat. Porter will never be ranked above Mosely.
     
    Southers, Salty Dog and kirk like this.
  9. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,047
    946
    Nov 6, 2017
    I think Crawford stops Cotto the way he stopped Gamboa. If Cotto got schooled by Floyd, I can only imagine the beating Crawford gives him at 140 and 147
     
  10. Geo1122

    Geo1122 Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    1,002
    Jul 7, 2017
    As many have said, I don’t consider Cotto an ATG. Though I do consider his achievements generally greater than Spence’s, given that Cotto is a 4 weight world champion, winning (and losing) belts for over 10 years (of his 16 year career). I’m not saying that you need to be a champion of multiple divisions, but if you’re a 1 division guy then you need to dominate that division. But Spence does have time on his side. It also has to be said that Cotto was fighting when boxers around those divisions were simply of a higher calibre. I mean, 3 of his losses are to ATGs. As things stand, I would say that Bud is the one that is potentially on that trajectory.
     
    Salty Dog and zulander like this.
  11. gollumsluvslave

    gollumsluvslave Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,261
    5,174
    Dec 20, 2020
    Cotto was an elite, but not ATG IMO

    This thread actually solidifies the thinking in my mind that Cotto/Spence & Crawford are all in the same vicinity, with maybe Bud a bit ahead based on 135 and undisputed 140
     
    wutang and zulander like this.
  12. sasto

    sasto Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,534
    16,090
    Aug 5, 2020
    Cotto was exactly what's missing for Crawford and Spence, which is a big cast of guys who are good/very good and not afraid to lose. Ten years ago there was more of that.

    If Cotto was born later he might have ruled over a whole little era of his own.
     
  13. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,326
    Aug 27, 2011
    None of these are ATG yet.
     
    Salty Dog likes this.
  14. Salty Dog

    Salty Dog globalize the Buc-ees revolution Full Member

    10,083
    5,778
    Sep 5, 2008
    I was always a big fan of Cotto, but nobody (or very few) ever favorably compared him with SRL for example. HoF? Sure. ATG? Nah.

    Straw man.
     
    Bokaj, Jackstraw and MadProf like this.
  15. jaytxxl

    jaytxxl Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,565
    3,479
    Mar 1, 2010
    Cotto’s for sure HOF but ATG not close. He did have the opportunity tho as a win over either Floyd or Manny would have put him there.Or if he would have beaten Sergio after the Dzinziruk or Barker fight he may have been judged different but the crippled version he saw that night did nothing for his resume long term.

    That said I could see Cotto vs Bud going similar to Cotto vs Floyd and Cotto vs Spence playing it like Cotto vs Margarito 1.