Depending which "these guys" you're talking about, I dunno about that. Frazier's technique, or Ali's, is as good as, or better than, any of today's heavies.
where did you get this from or confused I never talked on this era i said louis era guys tech vs 70s tech you agreed the 70s was way better
You've often said that 70s guys are inferior to 90s guys. That's where I got it from. What I said about 30s-40s vs 70s guys is that it varies from fighter to fighter. 70s tech is probably better on average...but also just different. Individually, though, a lot of 30s-40s fighters are better technicians than 70s guys. Compare Shavers (your favorite puncher!) to Walcott for example. Walcott is better. Walcott is more skilled. Boxers aren't a bunch of clones who are all the same skill level in each era. Anyway, you're not talking about winning a single fight. You're talking about duplicating Louis's entire career. That's much harder. You have to keep in good enough form to slaughter 25+ ranked contenders in a row. It's like rolling dice. Your odds of getting a "1" are low...unless you keep rolling. I'd favor Foreman to beat Max Baer in a shootout. I'd favor him to beat Simon. I'd favor him to beat Buddy Baer. I'd even favor him to beat Walcott. I wouldn't favor him to beat all four without a loss.
I'd bet the mortgage on Foreman doing to Simon, Baer and Walcott what he did to Alonzo Johnson, Boone Kirkman, Jerry Judge, Terry Daniels and Charlie Polite... in one hour.
Name one heavyweight in the 70`s that finished fighters with combos the way Louis did? The nearest would be Frazier doubling up on hooks but Louis threw two fisted combo`s, his 1-2`s were better than any heavyweight`s from the 70`s except maybe Holmes.
I am. They didn't have the same kind of nutrition and training back then, thus they weren't as strong. Couple that with inferior boxing technique, and it's only logical he didn't hit as hard.
people joe fought stood there which I said I said mutiple times name me a moving person who he did those fancy combos to cause from vid I see he stuggled to hit those types with those combos you brag on George had the same flaw looked good hitting people where he needed them to be but stuggled hitting them when they were moving he didnt look as good then his difference was bad aim and slow which is the reason he had that trouble and no Frazier wasnt the nearest sense he was better at it same with Larry ron and Jim