Tommy Morrison vs. Joe Louis

no thats not how legend words to me not here here legend only means being here for a long time or have said good stuff

 

Suppose I say the opposite? Every fighter who doesn't move like a 1940s fighter would lose to 1940s fighters.

Because the 1940s style is the bestest ever. And anyone who disagrees is blind or lying.

How do you respond?

 

Ah, ok. It's a status that you personally confer on them. A bit like being an Oscar winner, or winning the Medal of Honor.

 

yea you seen I call magoo one
sangria one of the best
70s
glass troll legend
swag troll legend
etm legend
flash legend but have been known for trolling to
and mutiple others some even been deleted which are legends to

people could look bad at me and look at me for being a legend cause of the mark I left or peope who dont like me will say that man were glad he is gone he was annoying and a idiot they like to think of me that way now so I know they always will my post will be here to see in future just like legends who I named who people I know will argee with or not I know that it will be seen

 

that wouldnt work buddy cross cause we know from video they moved bad and wasnt as skilled but if we had proof of the future eras moving worst or less skilled yea I would argee

 

Ok, then show me video of a 90s ATG who moved like the superior 1940s boxers.

If you can't, that proves that the 1940s boxers were better.

 

A lot of what you have to say is just YOUR OPINION not facts.

You’re overrating your opinion and trying to elevate it to the status of fact.

Other posters present their own opinions not PRETENDING nor deluding themselves that their opinions are fact.

You disagree with their opinions based on your own opinion. That’s a disagreement based on a difference of opinions not facts.

Falsely stamping an opposing opinion as a LIE is actually crazy and unnecessarily provocative.

However, I’m reasonably sure you understand all this which simply means your arrogant in your own opinion which you try to falsely pass off as fact.

Your interpretive scope on the value and possible greater accuracy of alternative, equal and opposite opinions is non existent. That’s all there is to it.

As to what certain terms mean to you ONLY, that’s all well and good.

However, if you call a chair a table while everyone else calls a chair a chair, you’re going to encounter some serious problems.

Perhaps provide your own special glossary of terms and definitions so that your unique interpretations are better understood.

But even then you contradict yourself.

Labelling someone a legendary troll was intended to mean they are legends for trolling, period.

Glass is no troll and you have nothing to back that opinion beyond it being your own opinion - and that’s also subject to your implied lack of understanding as to the correct and uniformly held definitions for trolls, opinions, facts and lies.

You’re keeping it fake, as usual.

 

If he understood it, it would be very odd that he persists. I don't think anyone actually believes him that his opinions are facts, so his approach doesn't seem to be working.

 

Tbh, in an emotionally conceited way deep down, some of us might hold certain opinions of our own as “facts” of sorts (such is the near 100 % likelihood of our opinion as we “see” it) but we know that, in all objectivity, whatever we think and no matter how strongly we think it, such thoughts still remain as opinions.

 

you like to troll so yea you would say that crazy legend glass is not known for trolling but its mutiple pages of him doing that and others and my words arent opinions I prove em with vids

I have proved mutiple times that razor tom bone bowe have moved better then joe and sonny they wont show me vid of them moving better cause they didnt that's not opinion its fact why dont you ask legend magoo why he didnt show me son moving like the people I named see what he says

I have proved to that people in joe era moved like trash with low skill level they wont show me people in 70s-90s fighting that bad or on a skill level not opinion they wont cause it didnt exist

these quotes I have proved with vid arent opinions it's not a thought I have its proof its fact you people just dont wanna believe in fact from vid or logic doesnt mean its not true

 

I just did it days ago with that troll 70s how did you miss that I proved it with the tom vid and he didnt show conn moving better he said footwork he never showed upperbody movement cause conn never did nobody ever did back then

i had proved to a man named Rahman who they like to act like was trash moved better then son who they compare to for some odd reason that man never was a big name he was mid I can name mutiple other boxers with proof that show these fighters moved way better

 

moneytheparanoidmegalomaniacaltroll

 

In most of the posts I've seen where you "prove" that 90s fighters are better, you just post a video and say, "Show me a 30s fighter moving like this."

This content is protected

So I'm doing a mirror image of that. Show me a 90s fighter moving EXACTLY like the 30s fighters. If you can't, it means the 30s fighters are better.

 

cross you stop it you I dont have to show you cause we have jers who moved like he was from the future which he moved better then the whole era and before

when I do show a person who did move like that era from 80s-90s which was bad it's still not as bad so it's not easy to find unless it is a no name

 

jers surely knew Emmett Brown.