If Crawford and GGG were in the same weight class, who would win?

In short, if even Canelo couldn't avoid from his punches, no one could. Crawford? Joke.

 

GGG is too basic and a plodder too slow. He is dangerous but Crawford is too slick and sharp for GGG.

 

As if would care about what you think about me.

I couldnt care less, man. Keep thinking that a guy who has only 3 meaningful fights can win to crawford

jacobs (so close it deserved a rematch, gg would kill his own mother rather than rematch jacobs)
canelo (lost, no matter what you nuthuggers say, the fact is that he lost to canelo, no robbery in the sencond fight, he LOST, period.)
derevyanchenko (blatant robbery, disgusting and blatant robbery of a fight that derevyanchenko won clearly)

Keep huging nuts, "hardcore" joke.

 

Crawford has beat loads of great fighters. Not!

 

Thread is funny. Crawford hasn't fought the best at welter and we are asking about fantasy matchup. at higher weight

 

more than gg, who only has beaten jacobs, and in a close fight.
Since you are so hardcore, you should already know.

 

as far as I understand the thread is not about crawford moving to MW. But about crawford being a natural MW (which he's not). Crawford moving to MW is stupid.

 

Yes, the mythical what if so and so were the same size. I never said he was moving up. I said fantasy fights at higher weight. I like Crawford but he hasn't done anything to warrant fantasy matchup when he has done **** in reality. His best days where at 140 and bellow , where he clearly had a huge size advantage. He is already looking at moving to 154.

I don't want to think about fantasy fights when he has so many great fights to be made that hasn't materialize.

 

GGG beat Canelo, everybody except you and a minority few know this, once you get that info straight, then evaluate.

 

lol. NO.

And it is something that amazes me. How fanboys insist on saying that the second fight was a robbery, when it clearly was not. But they say nothing about the first fight, that imho is more of a robbery than the second one.

But you know what? fan boys dont even care, they just repeat like parrots. "mayweather lost to castillo" "kovalev won the second fight" "canelo lost vs gg the second fight" "mayweather lost to maidana"....

just parrots, 99% of them havent even scored the fights, and I bet that a good % of them havent even watched the full fights.

EDIT: btw, you wont see them saying "gg blantatly robbed derevianchenko, that was disgusting". You wont see them saying that, even if it is nothing but the truth. Because you know what? they dont care either, 99% havent scored this fight either, and a good % of them haven even watched that fight either. They just repeat what others say as long as it makes them feel better.

 

I had canelo losing, that's why I dont understand people complaining about the second one, but not the first one. A draw could be fair to me, but I had him losing.

But in the second one I saw nothing weird, the second one for me is ok.

 

Well, if it was a win and a draw for GGG that would be completely different, but a draw and a loss is completely miss leading. I thought GGG pulled out the 2nd fight down the stretch watching at regular speed. Watching the fight and slowing things down when necessary to see what really landed, i had GGG winning the 2nd fight clearly. It was a double robbery. When the scores for the 2nd fight were getting ready to be announced i was comfortable about GGG winning because i didn't think they would rob him again because of the negative publicity from the first fight, and the Clenbuteral debacle, but they did it again, to add insult to injury. I thought GGG beat Jacobs by about 3 points and i thought the Derevyanchenko fight was really close, i had GGG by 1 point, the knockdown being the difference, other times i watched i had GGG by a little more, landing the cleaner, harder shots, but i have no problem with some saying GGG lost as well.