You are assessing the performance of the opponent, not Louis's performance, but you need to take into account how good you think Louis was at the time. Try to focus on the performance itself, not how god you think the opponent was. Any performance where the opponent beat Louis, is excluded form consideration, but you can comment on those if you want. I will go first: 1. Billy Conn 1 (An absolute masterclass against a very dangerous version of Louis) 2. Arturo Godoy 1 (I never liked this one, but you have to respect Godoy holding Louis to a SD) 3. Jersey Joe Walcott 1 (Only the fact that Louis was past his best, prevents this one being higher) 4. Abe Simon 1 (Described by Louis as the worst beating he ever took) 5. Tommy Farr (Only Louis's hand injury prevents this one being higher) I will be interested to see if anybody has it very different.
Yes, that looks right, I'd maybe swap Walcott and Godoy given that the majority of ringsiders though Walcott deserved that, but nothing wrong with that list. Maybe Bob Pastor at six?
Good list! I would consider the Louis-Walcott 2nd meeting a candidate for #5, in spite of Walcott being stopped in the 11th round. It was a very competive fight, still, and it gave Louis enough pause that he temporarily retired after that fight.
Given that you couldn't put him anywhere near the Conns or Walcotts of the world in terms of skill or legacy, one would seem almost forced to put Godoy in there. His plan of crowding Louis and smothering his efforts from a crouch was excellent, and he truly made the most of himself that night.
Well- really the Walcott fight wasn’t a LOSING effort by nearly every account. But as far as I understand the question you’ve pretty much hit it on the mark.
What would have damned Bruno, is that he would not have made it into the later rounds. Geeks like me, would have noted that Louis said that every punch that Bruno hit him with, shook him to his core, and made him reset. Nobody else would have cared. Bruno would have been confined to the dustbin of history, just another bum of the month!
I think Louis is actually the worst possible match up for Bruno. Bruno never learnt how to take a punch properly; he never learnt to tuck his chin, not panic and lower his centre of gravity and keep his legs under him. Bruno panicked, uncoiled and opened himself up and Louis would exploit that with the first combination he threw. I think he'd counter Bruno's jab, and then from there it'd only be a matter of time. Early KO for Louis IMO. Jan is right though, Louis would likely have a lot to say about Bruno's power after the fight.
I'm watching Witherspoon vs Bruno and he really tested Tim. At times it looked like Witherspoon was ready to go.
It's just an example where "nearly every account" really was for the losing fighter (Hauser was a notable exception). Around 30-35% of people who saw Louis-Walcott had it for Louis. That included the NY Times and RING (And 2 judges...).