Will we ever see an AJ vs Wilder fight

He was never 2 or 3 by consensus don't even attempt to go there.
Stiverne was garbage like King Kong is top 20 tops. not even top 10 at Heavy. Arreola and Jennings are both there best wins and neither of the were 10 at any point. The more people try and revise history the closer I examine the evidence and with all these crappy threads by NEETS has just pushed me the other way completely. I have looked and rewatched some of the fights. Wilder was always garbage and Fury isn't that much better.

 

Yes, he actually was. Even if you throw a temper tantrum.

 

I agree Ortiz was better than Stiverne, but the point remains that Wilder has several quality wins, why is why he was #1 in boxrec at one point.

 

Several quality wins?
No.1 on Boxrec?
You're not a very covincing Alt.

 

But not as well as it would have by a country mile, so why would they do it for less money?

that's the point, there.

 

You can't counter my argument, so you're attacking me personally to distract from you week position.

If you really believe I'm an alt, I'm willing to place a large wager on it. Let me know if you're interested.

 

How am I attacking you exactly?
I've already countered several times in this thread alone Alt.
Wilder's resume is very weak. You cannot get round this simple truth.
How would you "prove" you're not an alt numb nuts?

 

If Wilder's resume was weak, it would have been impossible to be the #1 fighter on earth according to the computerized ratings.

If you really believe I'm an alt, I'm willing to place a large wager on it. Let me know if you're interested.

 

Ratings don't mean anything. When exactly was Wilder No.1?
It coudn't have been whilst Joshua had 3 belts now could it?

 

Boxrec ratings are computerized and only take in ring results into account. All politics, belts and bias are ignored. So what you're really saying is that wins and losses don't mean anything.

The belts mean nothing in computerized ratings. Only in ring results. No belts, no politics, no nothing.

After Joshua lost, Wilder was the #1 fighter in the world.

 

Well said once the moneys gone sometimes people are happy cashing out. Until then fighters thinks they're worth too much to settle on a deal.

 

Boxrec doesn't mean anything you tool.
Also you don't know how that algorithm is formulated.
There was even a thread on it the other day about how British fighters are ranked far higher than they should.
Boxrec is only good for results if your putting weight on that the you're a casual.
Even taking that into account Joshua won the rematch so what Wilder was number 1 for 6 months?
A casual Alt account....

 

Forget about the past, Its the best deal they can make now. Wilder is on the decline and Joshua still has a big fanbase.

 

it is the most trusted resource promoters, managers and networks use to assess the true standing of a fighter.

the formula has been public knowledge for many years. please stop lying to everyone.

 

Casual trolling Alt....

If it's so great why is Callum Smith No.1 Light Heavy?

Tell me the algorithm then I'll wait......


/ THREAD