Why? I did. Whyte surprised me and was the deserved winner (and that's with not counting the KD that shouldn't of stood). That said I would back favour Parker to win if the two were to have a rematch (as I said on this forum a number of times previously).
Parker Whyte would be an interesting rematch. Not quite sure who I would pick. Parker had the tools to win the first fight but found a way to lose. Definite toss up for me
Tyson or Tommy! Obviously Tyson wins both. Can’t see him ever fighting Parker as they are quite close
I swear the more he posts the more I think he's a Fury. Every post is about them. And he's hid his post history, the filthy tinker!
At present? Whyte and Parker. As I stated before from what we have seen from Fury since his return I am unconvinced Fury anywhere as good as he was pre-retirment.
Regardless of whether he is another near as good as before, surely Fury has enough to beat Whyte and Parker. I'd be interested in hearing your breakdown for both of these bouts, if you don't mind. I struggle to see how Fury would be in any sort of trouble in either.
You are definitely trolling saying that at present Tyson loses to Whyte and Parker. I can understand one or two picking Whyte, but not many, whereas hardly anyone on the planet would pick Parker to win.
Why surley he has enough to beat Whyte and Parker? We've only got him beating 4 guys outside the top 40 then beating the most flawed and limited top 10 fighter with arguably the weakest resume in the top 10 x 3 times. We need to see against some quality opposition first. If he beats a Usyk, AJ, Whyte, Parker etc. I would put my hand up and admit I called it wrong but from what I've seen of Fury he clearly doesn't look anywhere near the standard he was and I'd don't buy into the theory that he just fights to opponents level. I will do a break down when I have a mo (or see if I can dig out one I've done for Whyte vs Fury before).
Haye would beat Bellew in the first fight. Alex Arthur would beat Michael Gomez. After beating Danny Williams in their rematch, believing that Audley Harrison would become a World Champion at some point .
The reason people call you out on it is because basically every single post you make is about Fury directly or indirectly. That includes the ones where you slate Wilder's "resume' in order to try and play down Fury's wins against him. For the most part, your posts read like you have a real personal issue with Fury rather than considered analysis. What saves you from being another "Ty is that guy" or Tony Hayers is that you always remain polite and calm in your responses - but your obvious agenda is a bit strange.
