The best 3 heavyweights in boxing history...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CroBox29, Jan 3, 2022.


The best 3 heavyweights in boxing history.

This poll will close on Jan 1, 2032 at 10:53 AM.
  1. Muhammad Ali

    88.1%
  2. Larry Holmes

    30.3%
  3. Mike Tyson

    20.2%
  4. Lennox Lewis

    49.5%
  5. George Foreman

    19.3%
  6. Joe Frazier

    3.7%
  7. Wladimir Klitschko

    16.5%
  8. Evander Holyfield

    8.3%
  9. Jack Dempsey

    6.4%
  10. Joe Louis

    52.3%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran Full Member

    9,603
    12,451
    Mar 24, 2019
    Hard to take in how many votes there are for Lennox Lewis.Great fighter yes, but top 3? Not for me
     
  2. Veerbone

    Veerbone Member Full Member

    451
    653
    Oct 15, 2021
    Beat a bunch of tomato cans, a scared and past his prime Spinks and an old past his prime Holmes.

    Tysons best pre-prison win IMO was Tony Tucker.

    Match his resume with the resume of Lennox. He didn't beat Lennox or Holyfield and all were around the same age. Holyfield and Lewis had longer primes because they were better fighters.
     
    AlwaysFirst likes this.
  3. 007 373 5963

    007 373 5963 Active Member Full Member

    944
    1,718
    May 30, 2020
    Holyfield and Lewis had longer primes because they didn't spend 3 prime years in prison nor did they have the mental health issues that tyson had. But in the end, it's hard to argue hypotheticals. We'll never know how much better Tyson could have been.
     
    bbjc likes this.
  4. bbjc

    bbjc Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    4,685
    Feb 25, 2012
    Yeah looking back i dont think it was even possible to keep tyson on the straight and narrow for a whole career...even with cus.

    But i dont really see anyone stopping him if he did manage it.

    I think people underplay him now....but he stood out. They we,re training the guy harder than any professional from about 14 years old...with one goal in mind. The situation was almost perfect to create a heavyweight champion.
     
  5. bbjc

    bbjc Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    4,685
    Feb 25, 2012
    In terms of longetivity....theres no arguments they both achieved more. But in terms of who could have been better and who was better for a period of time. I,d say tyson...by a good way as well. Theres a reason they all hyped tyson more than lewis and holyfield. They never got it wrong...its just that he started training like an amatuer with drink and drug problems. It basically finished the fighter he could have been.

    Think from the whole thing tyson lasting as long as he did....kind of showed how good a job cus done with him. He shouldnt have been beaten anyone after a certain point...the guy wasnt training properly for years. Thats on mike....no ones making excuses on his behalf. Just explains why he never remained the fighter he once was for long.
     
  6. Kosst Amojan

    Kosst Amojan Active Member banned Full Member

    549
    102
    Dec 14, 2021
    I rate Tyson a little bit higher than Lewis.
     
  7. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,988
    19,877
    Nov 27, 2010
    Missing Jack Johnson, Rocky Marciano.
     
    Kosst Amojan likes this.
  8. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    14,833
    12,274
    Jun 21, 2015
    Basically what other guys have already said. Louis, and Ali. And the 3rd one you can make your pick.

    Marciano, frasier, foreman, liston, wladimir... I like a lot charles "sonny" liston, nobody loved him, so I have a weak spot on him, imho liston is underrated. But nobody (apart from louis) has been 11 years in a row champion of the world, so I think that the third spot belongs to wladimir, even if I feel more simpathy for other fighters (I like a lot wlad too, dont get me wrong).
     
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2022
    Big Ukrainian likes this.
  9. Kosst Amojan

    Kosst Amojan Active Member banned Full Member

    549
    102
    Dec 14, 2021
    Well apart of Louis, were only Hopkins and Calzaghe 10 years or more world champion in row. But that doesn't matter how long, if you don't defend the title, respective 1 - 2 times in a year (Lasker was 27 years world champion, but didn't do a title defence between 1910 and 1921, so nobody rate him over Fischer). Only the number of successful title defences are important and if you achieve this in less time, then it is even more impressive, as you are bussier. Therefore has Ottke the record of title-defences in Super-Middleweight, not Calzaghe, as he did always 4 per year and achieved it in 5 and a half years, instead of over 10 (the first was 1999 and 21th. March 2004, the other had his first 1998, but his last in November 2007).
    Being long champion means nothing, when you havenot many fights, only shows that you are inactive/ lazy (as Fury and Ward are, with very little defences).
     
  10. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    14,833
    12,274
    Jun 21, 2015
    Being a long time champion means that you are not a matter of luck, nor something temporary, it means you are the real deal for truth. Even aging, you are still the best. Plus you prove to be the best of many generations of players.

    Opening 1000 tomato cans in a row during X years period means ****. It's not only that you have to defend your title, you have to defend it vs somone, not vs a tomato can. Only one schmelling fight is worh more than the whole otke carrer (which was a ****ing joke, btw), not to talk about the 11 years (and 25 defenses) louis was a champion. Career wise, it's ridiculous to compare someone like otke with joe louis. Ridiculous. Have I said it's ridiculous? well, it is.
     
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2022
  11. Kosst Amojan

    Kosst Amojan Active Member banned Full Member

    549
    102
    Dec 14, 2021
    You didn't understand the point: if you win the title and doesn't defend it for 2 - 3 years, you might be regarded as long time champion, ala Ward and Fury.
    Louis challengers were often used to be named bum of the month, so it was not always high quality, as Calzaghe had many poor challengers too and just improved at the end of his career his opposition (was a hometown boxer); there were Tucker Pudwills, Jimminezes, Evan Ashiras (that was even after Lacy), Peter Manfredos (dito), Branko Sobots and Mger Mkertchians among others. Until 2006 he would have been rated as a protected homeboxer who never showed what he is able to do against the best/ prove himself. There can Ottke a better opposition during their paralell reigns. Also had the first just the lower regarded WBO title (what was not much higher recognized than the WBU).

    Who compard Sven Ottke with Joe Louis (I don't know any otke)? I only read this from you, you are the only one who did this.
     
  12. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    14,833
    12,274
    Jun 21, 2015
    2-3 years is a long term champion? really? since when?

    Joe Louis fought "bums of the month", really? people like schmeling, jersey joe walcot or max baer look like bums of the month to you?

    You said that the number of defenses were worth more, and you used bum of the month otke (yes, otke is not half the boxer max baer was, for instance. And only max baers is worth more than the whole oposition otke fought in his whole freaking life) not me. I assumed you were trying to compare them both, glad to know you were not, because it's ridiculous, joe louis is an ATG and sven otke is nobody.

    Anyway, what am I doing talking with a guy saying that joe louis made his career by fighting "the bum of the month", man? I'm wasting my time. Good night sir.
     
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2022
  13. Kosst Amojan

    Kosst Amojan Active Member banned Full Member

    549
    102
    Dec 14, 2021
    Did you enter boxing last year? It is common sense that Louis' fought a bum of the month tournee and the newspapers were titled this. Ask any of the older routineers here, which are familar with boxing history. I don't like to waste my time with children...

    It says more about you than anything else, that you only can name one opponent of Louis and can't spell the names correct, about you refer...
     
  14. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    14,833
    12,274
    Jun 21, 2015
    Otke. Esven Otke.

    Though, it is properly spelled "BUM". Only max schmeling victory is worth 10 times more than the whole Esven Otke's, sorry, BUM's full career. Twice.
     
  15. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,039
    14,756
    Dec 6, 2008
    Current ranking

    1- Ali
    2-Louis
    2- Lewis
    3-Holmes
    4-Foreman
    4-Tyson
    5-Wlad
    6-Dempsey
    7-Holyfield
    8-Frazier

    Why is sugar nik not on the poll? Ah I get it. What's the point.