I don’t respect anyone who vacates a belt to avoid a fighter then fights for the same belt again as soon as said fighter is out the way.
If Kiko ices Galahad and Warrington within the space of 6 months we seriously need to think about knocking up a statue of him on these shores.
No the abuse was from b4 that. Alot of posters don't like the footy mob I can understand that, u cause your team ingle and jw beat kid.
What about if Galahad does the same, drops his rematch clause for a world title, for a non title fight against an unknown fighter at a weight class above? I get people are saying about weight and he might be tight at it, however he was coping with Martinez pretty much fine until he got clocked. I get Warrington was probably persuaded to drop the belt, to then set up a big fight with Xu (look at what happened to him in the end!), which didn't look great and then he lost to add insult to injury. He went into an immediate rematch against the guy who had just battered him. If it was for a belt, no one would of had an issue with him, but because of how it ended people are on Warringtons back. He can't just put his career on hold to wait for Lara if he gets offered a world title shot. Its just unfortunate how the second fight ended. Then you have a drugs cheat, who got badly KOed who were being told is likely not going to enact his rematch clause to move up in weight. Double standards here.
Good post. Also kid was talking unifications after kiko not moving up. Amazing how one punch changed things
Warrington is now pushing the ‘I never lost my belt in the ring’ narrative on social media. No mate just got absolutely flattened after you vacated it to avoid your mandatory instead.
Yes, shame on those posters who questioned Warrington and his "Crazy" mates going to Vegas. Your big buddy on here was even talking of him fighting Lomachenko
Galahad gets plenty of stick on here. It's a boxing forum. Should people not be able to discuss a fighter quitting his World title to avoid his mandatory or sneer at the much-awaited toothless tour of Vegas and Beijing?
It didn't take you long to bring up Warrington again for no real reason though in the Galahad thread. Warrington would barely be a discussion point otherwise. People can talk about what they want, just seems to be a convenient smokescreen to bash Warrington to divert away from what's happened with Galahad. Especially when you've been consistently attacking him. If Galahad doesn't invoke his rematch clause, it will be interesting to see your viewpoint...
You should already know that Maley has an agenda against Kid Galahad. I only see him post on Warrington or Galahad threads. Warrington probably beats Martinez on points. I think Lara's style was all wrong for Warrington.
