How would steroid-clean Evander Holyfield do against today's top heavyweights?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Jan 22, 2022.


  1. Toney F*** U

    Toney F*** U Boxing junkie Full Member

    7,224
    11,483
    Oct 16, 2019
    Yea we do, look at his first 4 pro fights where he was a lhw. That is a for sure clean Holy
     
  2. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,951
    17,010
    Jan 13, 2021
    That one barely scrapes by Beterbiev. Forget heavyweight. I thought Mark was referring to a hypothetical clean heavyweight Holyfield
     
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    That`s why I put his weight from the first Bowe fight, roids gives a fighter quicker recovery in between reps so they can put on muscle quickly, that`s why I also adding his weight v Tyson, he was far bigger.
     
  4. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Sanchez hasn`t beaten a top 10 heavyweight yet.
     
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Roids are used to build muscle mass quickly, Holy wasn`t a natural heavyweight.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  6. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,213
    27,925
    Jan 18, 2010
    I think the best way to ask this question is "How would Holyfield do in this division if it would be a completely steroid clean environment?"

    We know at least 3 of the current top10, including the current champion aren't or at least haven't been steroid free. And then there's a bodybuilder who blew up Holyfield style after he got gifted a gold medal.
    So, only having Holyfield steroid free wouldn't be fair at all.

    But, my opinion has always been that Holyfield wouldn't have been a real heavyweight even back in his era, if he didn't go all out on HGH.
    Heavyweight Holyfield, would b a slightly out of shape Cruiserweight (old weightlimit) and give up quite a bit of weight/power/height and even reach (while that was huge for his size) against all natural heavyweights, certainly the really big ones.
    So, he wouldn't do very well in a real dope free environment. He would be in the contender mix, but never be even considered one of the greats. Probably until the early 60's, when most Heavyweights were his natural size or even smaller.
     
    Entaowed likes this.
  7. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,174
    Dec 16, 2012
    Nope, it is equally irrational & unfair to assume everyone is dirty as it is absurdly naive to insist nobody is-& even those who tested + all must have been mistakes in the testing methods.

    But Holyfield clean would not be nearly as good against the Big Boys.
    Some of whom are natural, some not.
    An anybody who says they know how many is fooling themselves-letting idology & wishful thinking lead them away fromevidence & logic.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  8. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,174
    Dec 16, 2012
    Where is the evidence everyone juiced? That is an extreme, untenable position.
    Many were naturally big & when young & before even getting into sports.
    The Bownsville boys Tyson & Bowe are good examples.

    The size & muscle & definition someone like Bowe reached is not at all unlikely, nor did he gain it very quickly or otherwise suspiciously like having sudden "heart" or baldness problems when young.
     
    mark ant likes this.
  9. UniversalPart

    UniversalPart Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    14,633
    11,809
    Jul 1, 2010
    Against Vitor Belfort, when he couldn't afford them anymore.
     
  10. Col Mortimer

    Col Mortimer The question isn't indiscreet.The answer could be Full Member

    4,429
    8,054
    Jul 25, 2010
    I'm really not too clued up on the PED's side of things.

    Are there any physical negatives or trade off's regarding all round performance whilst a user is on them?, at the time of use?. Or do they enhance everything physically?.

    I know there's possible long term damage. Organs etc.
     
  11. Jason Gordon

    Jason Gordon Active Member banned Full Member

    719
    802
    Sep 26, 2021
  12. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,334
    17,555
    Feb 28, 2012
    As with anything there's always some trade off. It alows you to train more and recover quicker. It's pretty clear though that someone carrying more mass still has the same size heart (unless it's HGH) so this is a reason for gas tanks not being as good for some fighter and we can observe that clearly ober the last 30-40 years. Though steriods have been used a lot longer than that.. It doesn't just give you big muscles or getting super ripped that depends how much an individual trains and how much advantage that PED gives them with their core genetics being the limit.
    A study done a few years ago showed improvment of 3-15% over there previous personal best and it's depended on how an individuals genetics respond. As with anything the health issus come with abuse theres a long list of body builders say from Arnie's era who died prematurely with heart issues as well as the sprinter Flo Jo but these were people who took a massive amount of gear and this was the days of pre testing. It should be noted in the 84 Olympics they did a simplistic drugs test before it became mandatory and that showed just over 60% tested were on PEDS. There is a thread where I go through the history and evolution of use it's something I've always been interested since a young age.
     
    Col Mortimer likes this.
  13. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,334
    17,555
    Feb 28, 2012
    Thhe framing of the qwustion is odd..Just say "Does a clean Holyfield beat the current heavies?"
    Then the problem is that we know that half at least are on gear so.....not really a fair comparison.
    I think as he did in his own era he would struggle with the bigger guys struggling to hurt them due to the disparity in weight. although he would be quicker on his feet but at best he can only outpoint opponents rather than be knocking them out.
     
  14. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    8,703
    Sep 19, 2021
    Out of shape, huh? He was super dedicated at all times.
     
  15. Heisenberg

    Heisenberg @paulmillsfitness Full Member

    3,433
    6,430
    Apr 30, 2017
    Strip PEDS from all sports and you’d still have all the same elites and ATG’s. Yes the times, distances and general performances etc would be slightly less impressive but it still all comes down to the work ethic and competitiveness of the individuals.