Michael Nunn or Tommy Hearns?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by BEATDOWNZ, Apr 26, 2020.


  1. Claw4075

    Claw4075 Ezzard Charles GOAT Full Member

    338
    324
    Aug 27, 2021
    How is Robinson going to outjab a jabber when he himself hasn't faced a jabber in his career ?
     
  2. autumn1976

    autumn1976 Member Full Member

    204
    181
    Jun 30, 2021
    Nailed it, Claw4075. Nunn was the most fluid boxer since the Ali of the 1960s. Can see Hearns lasting the distance and being competitive in there. Don't see him beating a focused (and, of course, he would have to be focused) Nunn. At his best Nunn was almost untouchable in the ring.
    I don't think Nunn would beat Monzon over 15, though. Or even 12, to be honest. I love Nunn - but a fully focused Monzon (he was a smart guy and would know he was facing an uncommon talent) would prevail. As he did all the way through his middleweight reign.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2024
    Claw4075 likes this.
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,011
    49,018
    Apr 27, 2005
    SRR never faced a jabber in 199 fights, really.
     
    Richmondpete, ETM and Claw4075 like this.
  4. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,582
    May 4, 2017
    Because he had an amazing jab and had better fundamentals than Nunn, Ray was just a better fighter all round.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,582
    May 4, 2017
    Lamotta`s jab was very good in his final fight v Ray.
     
  6. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,582
    May 4, 2017
    Hearns was more skilled than Ali who was hugely flawe but maybe not at 160 where he got hit more.
     
  7. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,582
    May 4, 2017
    that doesn`t mean anything, fightes improve in the pros, that`s just a three round fight v green fighters.
     
  8. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,582
    May 4, 2017
    Sounds like Bob Foster instead of Hearns.
     
  9. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,582
    May 4, 2017
    No Hearns out-boxed Benitez who was far better P4P than Tate.
     
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,582
    May 4, 2017
    Benitez was better than Kalambay, Hearns had more power than Nunn, Tommy was well ahead v Barkley until he got caught while Nunn could only win a majority decision v Iran.
     
  11. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,582
    May 4, 2017
    Nunn never beat a fighter as good as this:
    This content is protected
     
  12. autumn1976

    autumn1976 Member Full Member

    204
    181
    Jun 30, 2021
    Very debatable claim there re T H being more skilful than Ali. Hearns was more orthodox, agreed. That does not, however, equate to being more skilled. Hearns certainly wasn't more skilful at avoiding getting knocked out, was he?
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2022
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,092
    27,438
    Jan 3, 2007
    I might make Hearns the slight favorite but not by much. Nunn was quick, skilled and had the height and reach to match Hearns.
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,092
    27,438
    Jan 3, 2007
    Agree. I love Hearns but he was very hittable
     
  15. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,137
    5,764
    Feb 26, 2009
    Hearns. He was greater by far.. Nunn had a good few years, but a bit overrated in retrospect. Tommy was a great... That is simplistic reasoning, but how can it be wrong. Hearns had a jab and always did, and used his experience later to get better..
     
    young griffo likes this.