As an amateur, 21 years old Vs 28 year old. Losing on points Spence would knock that dude out as a pro in a handful of rounds, and? This content is protected Spence literally had man running away at 11:34 with his back turned. LOL
This content is protected Spence dominated by a tiny southpaw resulting in him faking an eye injury to get out of the Pac fight.
You should be thankful of his injury preventing the Pacquiao fight as he would have literally murdered Pacquiao.
Pretty wild statement to make, considering Sapiyev never even turned pro to make an educated analysis of his ability to cross over, and is a Val Barker trophyist who during his run had near universal respect within the boxing world, and dominated Errol not just the once but twice, and Spence isn't even close to his only elite scalp in the amateurs.
28 YO ametuer? Not impressed with him beating a much young and inexperienced Spence. Why did he not turn pro?
Spence KO 1. Khan could have stayed in amateurs and been ATG GOAT material, but he didn't & achieved what he could as a pro, a different game almost. I don't care about Val Barker trophies handed out by corrupt AIBIA con men, I care about Tyson Fury doing demolition jobs on cruiserweights.
Same Sapiyev who won gold at 69kgs beating Fred Evans then winning Val Barker Trophy for best boxer at Olympics.... What a bum!