I said that you could argue that. that means there would be other people that would disagree. The light jab, as you call it, was really a push away. Certainly if Golovkin had landed those on Canelo you'd deny everything except the uppercut I know ya Shadow
Queef said NO PUNCHES LANDED. Who was right and who was wrong? Who was closer to the truth, me or QUEEF? Come on BCS8.
No matter which way both sides want to spin things....the fact of the matter is 2017 Canelo was not enough to handle Golovkin. Then he mysteriously pops dirty for clen two times! A juiced Canelo who in recent times has beat up on light heavyweights, still couldn't budge GGG in the rematch. Canelo wants Golovkin to disappear and be forgotten about. I really wish the Canelo fans on here would acknowledge what I just wrote! Golovkin is simply too strong and defensively sound for Canelo to knock him out, Canelo may actually win a 3rd fight on points, but no knockout.
The only side that is spinning things is the GGG side. Claiming no punches landed by Canelo in that clip as Queef74 did is clearly a boldface LIE. Confirmed by fellow GGG fan BCS8. Thanks @BCS8 for your help.
Accommodating me? GTFOH, he saw 3 punches at least, with 2 other "possibilities". He made that crystal clear. How about you weigh in on this? How many punches did Canelo land in that clip? Be honest, how many connects were there? We need a # of landed punchse. Thanks.
Seriously who cares if Canelo landed punches in that clip....he lost the first fight. Cheated and popped dirty, arguably lost the 2nd fight.
Who cares? Q74 cares, he asked people to weigh in on how many punches landed in that clip an attempt to "prove me wrong" lmfao. He initially called @rodxd an "idiot" for posting that clip and claiming that ZERO punches landed. Then Q revised his claim to say maybe one punch did land. BCS said at least 3 punches landed. Yikes.
Shadow11 think she knows EXACTLY when the tainted beef was consumed by Canelo. Says it happened with a dinner w/ Clinton. That should tell you enough about how serious to take this 16yo fanboy
Well Q called him an idiot by claiming that he posted a video where no punches landed. However BCS8 confirmed that he saw (at least) 3 punches land in that clip.
Are you genuinenly mentally ******ed? this is what I said: Followed by: It should be clear from my first comment that the main point was that, in response to the poster of the video, I was calling it out as pointless video to post as Canelo practically landed nothing. From my second point I clearly acknowledge there was one clean punch landed from Canelo. (I can't believe I'm having to explain this you ****ing idiot) Regardless the video was not a good example of whatever the poster was trying to demonstrate. You have turned this into a pissing contest with you screeching out your ears like little a girl "Queef said no punches landed". You heard of hyperbole? I clarify that there is one clean punch that lands. You keep banging on about 5 clean punches which is just ridiculous. Let's go through your exaggeration that you keep banging on about. 1at jab doesn't land or is parried. Right hand at best scuffs gggs right lat, can't see properly from the angle but looks pretty insignificant. Claiming otherwise is disingenuous. Canelo loops the next punch like a desperate leprechaun. The next exchange left hook right hand.. Are clearly slaps look how he throws him look at the damn hand positioning ffs. Not a clean landed punch and certainly not noteworthy especially of posting a video clip. Next exchange uppercut clearly lands followed by a low shot to the arm/elbow which you can clearly see in the replay. So really at best, 1 clean punch landed. And even that uppercut he landed didn't look impactful and damaging. It wasn't a full turn into uppercut. But it absolutely did land ans move GGGs head. Posting that video as if it means anything is just stupid though