Your right a opinion which is a thought isn't odd in general but a opinion thats not facts from video what you're doing is odd and this is the facts below Now if you see what I say is wrong you would have to have video proving what george could do to the fighters named its no match where george beat anybody fast or as great as defense with mike It is no one george fought who was as dangerous as Dave the destroyer who feasted on slow bad defense types who once he seen a opening he jumped on them Mike waited patiently while punches were thrown at him and countered Its matches for mike and Dave where they destroyed slow telegraphed people like george opinion no fact yes So yes you can keep a odd madeup opinion you can't make your own facts though I was always hated here for telling this raw truth cause of people like you saying stuff like you said opinion which doesn't matter what matters is facts on video You or nobody can go over that unless you provide video going over what I said can you no I dont have to prove you wrong its already been done before I existed here Me telling you this is not a debate cause like said above nothing can go over facts which existed before I was here im only telling you cause its good to let you odd people know how you shouldnt use thoughts and instead use your eyes which matters
Well no, BUT the Foreman that destroyed Frazier so easily, could conceivably take out the other 3 in as many rounds, don't you think ? in fact if Dempsey, The Rock, and Tua fight as they would normally, ie: aggressive, attacking , and rumpling forward ( and why wouldn't they its the only style they know ) yes I could see a scenario where Big George takes them out in one night, 2/4 rounds a piece. stay safe buddy, nice to engage you, first time I think.
George would have to be the favorite against all of them. Dempsey and Marciano never got hit the way George would hit them and while I think they would give George some troubles but there styles play right into Georges hands. Tyson would do well early but lacks the mental toughness to stay the distance with someone like George especially the younger George who was just as vicious if not more then Tyson was… plus the shear physical strength of George would come into play in clinches. Tua had good power and a great chin but George was a better fighter all around then Tua and had better in ring IQ… he’s the only one I could see lasting the distance because of his tremendous chin… but I’d take George by decision
He might take them all out in 3, but that is an unusual level of dominance against ATGs. Because of the size of Dempsey & Marciano & they were not elusive, he should get them by the latest the middle rounds. Tua was bulkier, had a great chin-& a high volume puncher earlier in his career. So he might last, a small chance to wear Foreman down & take him out, but he is going to the later rounds although it may be a TKO loss. I would not like the chances of anyone taking out 3 ATGs really early, even with a size advantage. He could not do this against all of the lesser fighters in Montreal. It is too much to ask of anyone really. Nice talking with you man!
I like Mike but it’s an absurd claim. Especially when you see how exhausted he was after less than 2 rounds with Frazier.
Ok guys you have the day, might have got a bit carried away, a glass of sherry whilst at the keyboard stay safe hombres.
Dempsey: Foreman KO within 5 in a very exciting slug fest. Dempsey's wild combinations and frightening speed give him problems early, but Foreman cuts the ring off and blasts him out eventually. Marciano: Foreman TKO round 3. The only advantage Marciano has is stamina which won't be a factor since he will have no answer for Foremans rough style, power, and size. It would be a buffalo attempting to take on an elephant. Tua: Foreman TKO round 9 or UD. If Tua opens up, both men beat each other up and hit the canvas until Foreman manages to stop Tua with his wider variety of punches and landing his heavy jab. If Tua goes into his shell, Foreman takes a relatively easy decision. Might resemble the Chuvalo fight. Tyson: He has the best chance here. He could potentially come out the corner at full throttle landing a barrage of unanswered punches at high speed. If he scored a knockdown and then follows up with more powerful blows, many refs could stop it. However, if Foreman gets up and hits Tyson back with something big that could weaken Tyson's confidence. I think it would actually be a very ugly fight with lots of mauling, shoving, fouls. I think more often than not, Foreman neutralizes Tyson's approaches with guard manipulation, pushing, and walking him into uppercuts. Tyson would need to fight the absolutely perfect fight with 200% focus to win, otherwise he either gets dragged into a brawl (which he would probably lose), or is bullied by Foreman and beaten into the canvas unable to mount an offense. My guess is Foreman KO within 6 more often than not.
Very good analyses G.C.! I would say the majority of the time Foreman beats Tyson, the stylistic advantage trumping lesser speed. But yet Tyson has the best shot & could win about 3-4 out of 10. Money managed to return & get banned yet again not much longer than...Immediately. He still does not comprehend basic facts like---what facts are. That interpretations of video & analyses like who does what how well-is different from actual facts. It is bad enough that it is hard to understand what he is writing, but then when he starts putting people down again & picking fights... Unfortunately this is not someone who is likely thriving in real life.