Pac-Hoya or Pac-Campbell?

I believe Campbell can with enough heart..

 

pac has more of a chance of winning against campbell rather than DLH.. we can even make a poll about this just to prove it.

campbell holds the 3 other belts, that would make pac the first ever fighter in the lower weights to hold all belts. BIG major accomplishment

DLH is nothing but a name with big money surrounding him.

 

It's nice to dream bud.

But Pac winning against DLH is impossible . . . out of the scenario.

DLH is looking for a win before he retires and all indications points to him getting that win against a guy coming in from three weight divisions down.

DLH . . . if this fight pushes through . . . wouldn't let himself be humilated to the max in his last fight. :rofl

 

There's no impossible in boxing. Pac will prove it.

 

Do you think if Pac beat's Oscar should he fight the winner of Margo vs Cotto:huh ?

 

more possible to win against campbell than DLH..

a higher chance of probabilty...

 

Ofcourse Pac will have easy time with Campbell. Peden beat him twice. Peden is not even half a fighter as Pac.

PBF becomes a Known star and become a Crossover star to the Mainstream by beating DLH. that's with the Boring fight. Pac beating DLH spectacularly will cement his ATG status.

Pac beating nate is no different from Pac beating Diaz.

 

Nobody is dissagreeing with you there. It's common sense.:-(

 

I'm a fan of both fighters - but Pacquiao vs De La Hoya makes no sense. They have no business fighting each other. De La Hoya has too many options at welterweight or jr. middle that deserve higher consideration such as Winky Wright or the winner of Cotto/Margarito.

Pacquiao needs to make his way through 135 first - THEN jr. welterweight.

 

pac-nate/ dlh vs cotto

 

I’d definitely like to see Pac go against DLH next before it’s all too late. It’s pretty obvious DLH has already set a special day to hang his gloves – Dec 6 – 08. What more does this man need to prove in his career or still want materially anyway? If there is someone who needs some proving to do, it must be Campbell. Does the name Robbie ring a bell? I’m sure NC can wait for Pac after the battle with DLH assuming he wins against Guzman of course.
I guess the question here is which is more grand the unification of belts or the victory of a small man against a big man in the world of boxing? I say ACTION SPEAKS LOUDER THAN words!!!
Anyway, Pac losing to DLH can still attract a fight with NC, but losing to NC - goodbye De La Hoya. To those saying DLH will beat Pac easily, I’d say it would be a walk in the park for DLH , with lions that is (like as if we don’t know anything about the Pac – the man who seems to have forgotten the meaning of impossible). I’m more of a fan of what greatness is all about than what causes it.

 

Pac- Campbell is much better if you look at it, with 4 belts on the line, and lightweight supremacy, it's worth the $$$$, if you'll ask me but since Campbell-Guzman seems a done deal, and all other lightweights are busy, team pac has limited options that's why i think their pushing for pac-dlh fight in Dec. and i see nothing wrong with it, it's not the first time that we've seen a smaller fighter takes on the more bigger guy for the sake of proving something.

So, i say, why not let them fight, give them a chance to face each other in the ring for just 1 fight... after all, we may never see them go at it again and we'll be left wonderin', what would have happened if ever...?

 

:good intelligent guy like you are needed here. welcome!

 

:good
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

now eat some crow foos