15th fight. Whyte - A-side decision against Chisora, sparked in 5 by a shot Povetkin in Britain Title. Martin - came to take a dive 1. Breazeale - KO’d in 1 by Wilder, schooled by Wallin in America 2. Molina - came to take a dive, as became his modus operandi 3. Wlad - retired after 4. Takam - legitimately KO’d in 8 by Chisora the fight after, stopped in 6 by Joyce 5. Parker - got dropped by and lost to Whyte, A-side decision against Chisora, who also dropped him 1. Ruiz - in good shape (by his standards) but got dropped by and had a hard fight over 12 with a 40+, 21 months inactive/retired, coming off a loss Arreola 2. Pulev - virtually retired after The partial exceptions: 13th fight. Kevin - went the distance with Dubois and Hrgovic 3.5 years later but the win also aged well at the expense of Pulev and Ruiz 6. Povetkin - aged well at the expense of Whyte and Parker
Pretty much on the money but I wouldn't say Parker got an A side decision against chisora. He absolutely battered him.
The first fight was an A-side decision: even Parker's coach said that he thought Parker lost. The rematch was legit but age and beatings had finally caught up with Chisora.
PMSL. How many pages do you think this one will do NEETz mate? . More or less than the 'Fine wine'?. Which thread takes it and why?. Fine Wine Vs Egg Sandwich. Luv it!
His resume has never been the "bEsT oF tHe HeAvYwEiGhT dIvIsIoN" like the sheep on here would tell you. But it is better than Wilders Also don't forget his rematch after losing to Ruiz consisted of him literally running away scared from an even more over weight Ruiz Also don't forget the absolute Clobbering Usyk did to him almost stopping him
All facts. I do have to give credit to Hearn for his salesman skills, and his careful selection of Joshua’s opponents at the most opportune time, to hoodwink the Matchroom casuals into believing Joshua has a mythical, amazing resume
His resume is grossly overrated. I can't remember exactly the content of the thread I posted a few months back, but it was something along the lines of: if you remove all the 40 year olds from AJ's resume you're basically left with Joseph "Average Joe" Parker, and two losses. Things have calmed down since getting dominated by Usyk, but I don't think I've seen such a collectively smarmy, uninformed, and willfully ignorant group as those of the cult of AJ.
It's ironic because one of those same sheep (not JT) liked your post lol What are all of the factors that should be taken into consideration when assessing the quality of a record? Because in many important respects, Wilder has the superior record and will probably be remembered as the better fighter. And regardless of the overall quality of AJ or Wilder's records, there is no question that AJ's has aged poorly while Wilder's has aged well. AJ's loss and win over Ruiz isn't being directly critiqued in my op, it's about how they aged. EVERYBODY expected the in-shape Ruiz to stop Arreola without any difficulty whatsoever. They weren't expecting there to be serious questions after the fight whether a prime Arreola would have beaten him lol. The Usyk loss hasn't yet aged poorly, it all depends on what Usyk goes on to do from here. If he clearly loses to Fury and then retires, the Usyk loss (and AJ's extra loss to Usyk coming up) will have aged poorly.
Aside from 41+, 17 months inactive, dethroned Wlad and 39+, dropped by Price in his previous fight Povetkin, no win on AJ's record is above the level of a prime Chisora.
"The God" came to take a dive and was very green at the time. His most impressive one sided win imo was the destruction of Kevin, which showed that AJ does have outstanding combination punching against a static target on the ropes. Dubois and Hrgovic are supposed to be aggressive power punchers but neither could get rid of a considerably more shopworn and washed up version of kingpin.
Johnson was a good win agreed although past it still durable against most contenders. Would still rate Martin as his most impressive one sided outing.