Errol Spence is top 10 h2h at welterweight

Being technical means nothing. History shows better technical boxers lose as often as they win.

 

before the fight ends, crawford will hit the canvas twice. twice. crawford will start off looking sharper than spence, who will take about 3 rds. to start punching the holes in crawfords defense. by the 9th rd. buds legs will start getting shaky. by the 12th rd. bud will have kissed the canvas twice. last time i predicted 2 knock downs was pac vs matthysse. even called the rd it would end in. im gonna see how much of my analysis is just incredible coincidence. i only make such predictions about my favorite fighters. pac and spence have been at the top of that list for years, so ive studied them, i know exactly what they bring to each situation. thats why i said thurman would be easy work for old pac. and in the same sentence said spence would break manny in 2.

 

Marvelous analysis, you called an older fighter beating an old-and-shot fighter, an active fighter beating someone only one fight back from an injury, and think an extremely large and younger welterweight would beat an undersized and older welterweight. I can see why you have high regard for your own opinion.

So anyway I'll see you all again when Crawford stops Spence in 10 or less.

 

This wont age well.

Not at all.

In 12 months time we all will be smiling at this.

 

Not seeing it...and I don't dislike Spence at all...really disagree with your take on the Duran one.i think .Duran would absolutely maul him .

He might not even get passed Crawford yet ..and I'm not all that high on him

 

no, i called exactly how many times he would hit the canvas before stoppage, and called the exact rd. it would be stopped in. but those are just 2 predictions in a very long list of correct predictions of both fighters careers. why dont we compare each prediction for each fight. an obvious pattern will emerge, indicating who knows what. that way it aint just a matter of feelings but actual results.

 

Yes, yes, your super-boxing analysis totally made those predictions. Totally. Probably where all that brainpower went that keeps you from hitting say, the "Shift" key to capitalize words and make your posts something approaching readable without the Rosetta stone. So when Crawford stops Spence in 10 or less, will you lose these always-accurate prediction powers, like Samson getting a haircut? Those amazing prediction powers that no doubt (no doubt) earned you a fortune in gambling? What with all the correct rounds and knockdowns you must be regularly banking +2000 odds minimum!

 

so no comparison then? were just gonna up the emotions instead? pretty much what i figured. i mean, what other choice you got? im sure youre too busy, or you dont bother with such nonsense, or its all luck anyway. does the reason really matter?

 

No emotions, merely the incredulous amusement of someone thinking they have superpowers. And I already gave my prediction, Crawford in 10 or less. I could give a few more details of "Spence will occasionally show signs of life but it will otherwise be fairly to extremely one-sided" but why bother, my prediction is so diametrically opposed to yours it's impossible for both to happen.

 

oh, now youre confused, is that it? you didnt realize i was talking about our track records regarding previous fights, huh? you know, all the fights that would create a pattern of our individual knowledge. those predictions. but keep at it, no need to wait for the crawford fight, your posts are making me crack up right now, lol.

 

And another was 49-0. He wasn’t overly technical and another went 46-0. He was considered a slapper. Interesting how you completely missed the point though. The more technical fighter doesn’t always win.

 

Not half as much as yours will come fight night.