Errol Spence is top 10 h2h at welterweight

Laugh for joy, my friend! It's a bright new day of not being an idiot. Well, still an idiot, actually, but baby steps!

 

85. thats what im guessing your iq is sitting at. i will put money on it. thats about the level where you are too dumb to know just how dumb you are.

 

Is that also the number of amazing totally correct boxing predictions you made, that you then turned into a fortune in gambling?

 

Yeah but don't forget Floyd had "help" in getting some of those "winning "decisions. Just like Canelo today

 

yeah, you figured me out.

 

Yes, I have.

 

You debunked nothing though. We have decades and generations of history that shows that the more technical fighter isn’t always the victor nor is it the determining factor. It really means nothing being the more technical boxer. If being more technical meant anything Mayorga wouldn’t have beaten Forrest twice. Salido would have never beat Lomachenko. Etc etc. Not sure what you’re trying to argue here because it’s pointless.

 

heres prediction number 86. anyone in the forum with an iq of at least 100, now knows what a simple minded assclown you are.

 

I''ve always liked Spence but like Crawford needs to fight elite fighters at Welter and not manlets or past prime considering both boil down and are huge at the weight.
Welterweight is one of the deepest divisions in boxing historically so at this point neither is anywhere near that accolade but that doesn't mean they can't achieve it but they need to fight each other and have many more fights to at least have a claim.

 

I'm sure it will be as accurate as your prediction of Spence beating Crawford.

 

thats cause youre simple. what intelligent people can tell about you from this thread doesnt need to be verified by any future circumstances. if you werent so damn simple, you would have probably been able to figure that out.

 

Here are the 'circumstances'. Anyone who thinks Spence does anything better than, or holds any major advantages in a fisticuffs fight with Crawford, then uses predictions about three of the easier fights to predict (PAC VS MATTHYSSE ) to hail themselves as Nostradamus, has no cause to be calling anyone...well anything really, as they show a clear lack of analytical ability when it comes to boxing.

Making fun of your self-admitted purposeful lack of capitalization that makes your dumb ideas less legible is just side material.

 

sure it does, pumpkin.

 

It certainly does, sweetie pie.