Longest a title challenger has been stoned walled (post Color Line)?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Finkel, Apr 20, 2022.


  1. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,629
    May 13, 2014
    Toney could probably decision Vitali on the right night but gets outpointed by Wlad.
     
    KO KIDD and Journeyman92 like this.
  2. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,780
    36,515
    Jan 8, 2017
    The colour bar prevented Manchester welterweight, len Johnson, and other s like him from striking out and achieving more. The national sporting club had a hand in this because of a so called slight on them, by Jack Johnson. It was in 1948 in the UK when the colour bar was gone.
    Dick Turpin, Randy's bruv, was the first to strike out and won the British middle weight title.
     
    Journeyman92, thistle and Finkel like this.
  3. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,349
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Your saying he first fought in an eliminator in 2016 but there's a difference between an eliminator and a final eliminator and can you refer to what this eliminator in 2016 was because I don't recall it. Luis Ortiz has just beaten Charles Martin in an IBF eliminator and they've told him he has to fight Filip Hrgovic in a final eliminator it's all in the small print.

    Speaking of Luis Ortiz, Whyte rejected an offer by the WBC of a final eliminator vs him and Whyte's fans went on as if this was some sort of controversial thing and completely ignored the fact that he could have got the Wilder fight much quicker if he fought Ortiz and managed to beat him which would be no formality.

    Whyte is only the mandatory now, since his last fight and he's getting the shot.

    Whyte HAS NOT been mandatory since 2016, he's been number 1 ranked which is completely different. I'll repeat he refused a final eliminator, he refused a title shot vs. Anthony Joshua, he failed a steroid test in his vacant Interim title fight which froze his status with the WBC for the best part of a year until Hearn bribed off the testing committee or at least that's what it looked like to me as that matter most definitely wasn't fully resolved, at best you can say expensive lawyers got him out with a loop hole otherwise he'd probably have been looking at a 5 year ban.

    So no absolutely Whyte hasn't been hard done by like your trying to imply. Look at Golovkin, he held the WBC Interim title for a good while before he finally got a shot at the WBC title which Martinez, Canelo and Cotto had been passing about at catchweights against each other and welterweights, no knock out defeats, no failed steroid tests, he also had to wait a long time to finally get the proper WBA title as everyone was ducking him like the plauge.

    Martinez was also hard done by with the WBC and was basically robbed out of his title with technicalities so they could gift it to Chavez Jr. That's just a few off the top of my head who've had a much harder time than Whyte who hasn't been hard done by whatsoever.

    Could you imagine Hagler before he had a shot refusing a chance to fight for the unified title or refusing a final eliminator and failing steroid tests.
     
    Cecil likes this.
  4. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,349
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Promoters run the sport they get the money and the sanctioning bodies essentially just milk a bit from them to add a bit of prestige and pinash to big fights by saying it's for their title. Fighters that generate a lot of money always get looked after by the sanctioning bodies.

    The IBF were caught on camera taking bribes and they are the most integral and true to their ranking of all the 4 main sanctioning bodies.

    Money makes the world go round unfortunately and there's always been an A and B side to negotiations. Dillian Whyte has approached all negotiations for him to get a title fight as if he's the A side which he clearly isn't and during that time he's been KO'd, should have lost the first fight to Chisora, failed a steroid test and refused an eliminator so hardly the worst done by.

    And good I hope you weren't playing the you know what card with your original post as that would be a pathetic argument what was going on back then was completely different and if you were playing that card realistically you should be looking at a ban for it.
     
  5. thistle

    thistle Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,454
    7,986
    Dec 21, 2016
    and it was only lifted because ALL the Best Big Boys were near their end and retiring.

    the new Heavyweights were Don C ockell, Jack Gardner & Johnny Williams... none at L-HW and only Randolph Turpin at Middleweight cum L-HW.

    Roderick, McAvoy, Gilroy, Mills & Woodcock were all near finished and soon retiring... 'IF' there were a sure shot WHITE Middle or Light-heavy, that Colour Bar would have stubbornly remained for another few years.

    the BBBofC, were an Arrogant Stuffy English OLD Boys Club & Rule Britannia pompous despotic body.

    only NEEDS Must, not dignity or decency for moral change, among a despicable privileged elite.
     
  6. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    8,743
    Sep 19, 2021
    I'll say this about governments and covid. Boxing didn't need to stop. Maybe fights needed to be held outside, or held without fans, but the fights themselves could have gone on, given that you really only need to test the two fighters, the ref, and the announcer. Nobody from the different camps needs to go near each other.

    Sucks that this stuff impacted the career of fighters.

    ... hell, during lockdown, i'd have been happy to pay the PPV fees multiple nights a week for halfway decent boxing cards.
     
  7. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,780
    36,515
    Jan 8, 2017
    Has as always been the case tbh.
     
    thistle likes this.
  8. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,349
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    The whole thing was unnecessary and unlawful. Still though wasn't the boxing world to blame for that.

    Whyte won the WBC interim title in 2019 which is tainted by a failed drugs test that held things up about a year for him, the lockdown held things up about a year, getting knocked out vs Povetkin did too and now he's getting a title shot less than three years after despite all that.

    The fact that Whyte got an immediate rematch with what appeared to be a very compromised Povetkin who probably shouldn't have even boxing tells you how looked after he's been.

    The situation in the past is completely different really is a pathetic thread this.

    Just shows how man casuals get all their info from Eddie Hearn's lies on ifl interviews.
     
  9. Finkel

    Finkel Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,027
    4,795
    Feb 10, 2020
    Can I ask you to stop derailing this thread, please. I will respond one more time to these posts. After that, respectfully, can you take it to the general forum if you have some weird personal vendetta against an active fighter.
     
    KO KIDD likes this.
  10. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,349
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Not really because you have asked the question about an active fighter. I've given you examples of other active fighters who've been stone walled harder than Dillian.

    There's a difference between not being allowed a title fight no matter what vs. waiting a long time to get one because you're a diva and want more millions.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  11. Mike Cannon

    Mike Cannon Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,185
    7,510
    Apr 29, 2020
    Moore
    LaMotta
    Burley
    Greb
     
    Finkel likes this.
  12. Finkel

    Finkel Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,027
    4,795
    Feb 10, 2020
    Your example of the IBF is irrelevant. Clear as day that was used a promotional tool, and not as a way to get a final eliminator against Hrgovic. Because guess what, after an eliminator a final eliminator is expected. Whyte wanted to be matched against Stiverne, but they allowed the drafting in of a soft touch in Breazeale (see interviews with Stiverne's management). Note Breazeale also rejected offers to fight Whyte (Breazeale admitted to this on film in interviews).
    The WBC went out of their way to block a final eliminator. It took a court case to finally get them to call Whyte v Breazeale in 2019.

    Actually Breazeale was on film admitted to rejecting offers from Whyte, he then fought the banned Molina, who was coming off a loss and a six rounder. As I said it's on film in interviews that Breazeale was a soft touch brought in for Stiverne to fight as Stiverne took step aside as he was mandatory (That is a whole other bag of worms) to fight Wilder. So you talk about top 20 fighter this and that, but look the other way when fighters ranked below Whyte were getting opportunities.

    Wrong again. Whyte rejected an offer to fight in an elminator to become second mandatory after Breazeale. The WBC would also give no guarantees that Whyte would indeed get the title shot. So it was a meaningless exercise of kicking the can down the road.
    Eliminator 1 = Whyte v Chisora (q4 2016)
    Final Eliminator = Whyte v Breazeale (q3 2017) - But this didn't get made by the WBC.
    Instead we got
    Eliminator 2 = Breazeale v Molina (q3 2017)
    Final eliminator = Whyte v Breazeale...
    Ortiz was busy first getting a drugs ban in q3 2017, and then getting stopped by Wilder in q1 2019. And, that qualifies him to step into a final eliminator? Give it a rest.

    Pretty sure it was a contracted rematch. Also for a guy with Covid there were photos of him attending gala dinners in Russia. One side might suspect he was trying to get out of the fight and Covid was a convenient they ran with, i.e. he wanted one last big pay day against the WBC champion. He didn't want to fight Whyte again.
    Not that any of that is relevant to the WBC delaying stonewalling Whyte since "late 2017"

    Stating the obvious there. I could go into the conflicting interests having one board member connected to WBC/PBC/Barclays Center, and how the PBC were way to close to the WBC in all of this, but do I really need to?

    sigh, I already answered this in the previous post. Why are you repeating the same points I already debunked?
    1. No one said he has been mandatory since 2016. He started his journey to become mandatory in 2016... (not that you care for the truth of the matter)
    2. He didn't refuse a WBC final eliminator (see above). It's ironic that you bring up casuals and IFL, and spout so much uniformed rubbish on this subject.
    3. Again Joshua has nothing to do with the WBC, and again Whyte accepted the offer, but Joshua kept adding caveats. Anyone who actually followed the new at the time, knows Joshua had no intention of fighting Whyte. He wanted to pursue his American debut, rather than fulfil the Wembley date against Whyte, when he couldn't get Wilder or Fury. I don't blame him really, but it's more on Joshua than Whyte. (I brought up IFL, because Hearn was caught out in that interview with Whyte, and the truth of the matter was revealed)
    4. "it looked to me like it was never fully resolved"
    Who gives a ****, why don't you read the press release from UKAD? It's pretty clear that what happened was what many reported at the time. And again WBC use VADA, and when it came to Molina they ignored the UKAD ban... so you have no argument on that.
    5. Why are you bringing up Golovkin for? He was the WBA super champion at that time you are trying to make some weird comparison. I don't see how the shenanigans of Clenelo is an excuse for how the WBC acted toward Whyte. You seem to just be throwing anything at the wall to see what sticks at this point. smh


    ----------------------------------------------

    So in summary you have written what amounts to 6 maybe 7 posts on this subject showing a complete lack of knowledge for the events surrounding the WBC and Whyte, and instead keep spouting some weird narrative you have in your head. And now you resorting to calling people casuals who actually bothered to read the newspapers and watch interview with fighters, trainers and promoters from various media channels. smh



    I really don't know where you get all this crap, or why you would spout it endlessly on a forum.


    See above. So, now if you have nothing of substance to actually add, let's leave it there. I think most honest actors can see that Whyte has been getting screwed over by the WBC for going on 5 years now (2017 to 2022).
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2022
  13. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,349
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Prior to the first Chisora fight who had Whyte beaten that warranted a world ranking? Dave Allen was probably his most notable win at that point.

    Does he deserve a chance now yes but he's not been avoided or kept down by the boxing powers. The reason the fighters you mentioned got a shot quicker is they were under the same management as Wilder who was WBC champion at the time just like Whyte got offered a shot vs. Joshua even though there was fighters ranked above him.
     
  14. Finkel

    Finkel Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,027
    4,795
    Feb 10, 2020
    Whyte entered the WBC rankings at #20 following his performance against Joshua who was already WBC#2 in the British Title fight (and yes, I'm sure his promoter was expected to pay something into the WBC coffers). He then slowly climbed the rankings over three fights before taking on Chisora in the eliminator: He fought Bacurin in an 8 rounder a month before fighting Dave Allen for the WBC International. Then Lewison for the British. Following that, Chisora in a WBC title eliminator. I don't see what problem you could have with that to be honest...

    Isn't that a contradiction.

    I agree with you on the point that he didn't get his shot because the WBC was allowing the PBC to go down their roster of fighters for Wilder rather than fighting opponents who were foolishly thinking they could climb the ladder and get the title shot. But that is just highlighting the problem, and supports that Whyte was getting shafted.

    Who were they then? This was a voluntary for Joshua. Joshua was IBF, WBA and WBO champion. Whyte was #1 on the WBO rankings.
    If you are talking about the Ring rankings, Whyte was #4 at the time, which would mean Joshua #1, Fury#2 and Wilder#3. So given both Fury and Wilder rejected the fight. There was no other fighter ranked above Whyte at that time...

    Glad we agree
     
  15. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,796
    17,850
    Apr 3, 2012
    I'm not going to go deep into detail on this but Whyte declined eliminators with Ortiz, tested positive for steroids, and got sparked clean out by Povetkin. It's not quite the same as being stone walled. And he took orders from Hearn, which appeared to be breadcrumbs to a fight with Joshua.

    There's a strong contingent of UK fans who seem to think that "surely that's good enough" is how to get a title shot although in reality you have to follow the guidelines of the sanctioning body.

    During the same era, Fres Oqurndo had a court ordered title shot that never materialized in something like a decade.
     
    NEETzschean, iceferg and Finkel like this.