Longest a title challenger has been stoned walled (post Color Line)?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Finkel, Apr 20, 2022.


  1. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,797
    17,850
    Apr 3, 2012
    I'm gonna throw in Tim Witherspoon's name. After losing to Bonecrusher Smith, Witherspoon would've been a viable title challenger from 87 to 97 when he lost to Donald. During that time, he lost an embarrassing sd to Bigfoot Martin and a competitive decision to Mercer but otherwise remained unbeaten. No shot materialized even after beating Al Cole and Jorge Luis Gonzalez back to back in 96.
     
    KO KIDD, Gazelle Punch and Finkel like this.
  2. KasimirKid

    KasimirKid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,245
    3,381
    Jun 1, 2018
    Pretty much agree with the Patterson analysis, but not so much with the Liston-Machen analysis. Machen fought Liston with one hand in 1960. His right hand was hurt in training and he was unable to use it effectively against Sonny and did pretty well anyway. Eddie would have had a better chance with two hands. The main thing militating against a better performance by him is that his career took a rapid downhill progression soon after Liston won the title.
     
    Finkel and Pugguy like this.
  3. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

    17,500
    28,446
    Aug 22, 2021
    Excellent points Kid.

    Given Eddie’s own decline, I should’ve said putting aside any deteriorations on Machen’s part also, not just Liston - so basically, a hypothetical rematch with both men fullly able and fit.

    Yes, I understand Machen did claim an injured right hand. Not to dismiss it out of hand, but do we know how and when he made that claim and how well it was substantiated?

    Eddie also claimed that Liston dipped his gloves during the fight causing Machen’s vision to be impaired - and it seems that claim was made well after the alleged fact. the claim being made post Miami 1964 after Ali’s own issues in round 5 v Sonny.

    But then Liston claimed to have carried a bad shoulder into Miami which worsened during the fight - and I tend to believe that is true and feel that it did impact Liston’s performance - so it’s only fair to give Machen equal consideration.

    I might watch the fight again. One thing I recall, Machen did use the right seemingly without issue when in close, in clinches etc. but not so much at long range.

    Injured or not, more use of the right hand at range would’ve made Machen more vulnerable to Liston’s multi purposed left hand - so, in some ways, due to injury or not. , Machen not employing the right hand so much at range effectively made for a less risky and safer fight for him - but of course if Eddie could’ve put the right over effectively and used it more often it may well have unsettled Liston and broke his rhythm and momentum.

    Since I first watched their fight, with repeat viewings thereafter, I’ve come to really appreciate what an excellent 12 rounder it really was on both fighter’s parts. Cardio wise, both men terrifically fit and another 3 rounds to make it a 15 rounder wouldn’t have been a problem for either man IMO.
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,868
    46,648
    Feb 11, 2005
    Bullsh. He couldn't even beat simple Peter. He had the gift of a lifetime against the mighty Fres Oquendo. Oh, sorry, not of a lifetime, we must remember Tiberi. A roided up fatbody.
     
    KO KIDD and Journeyman92 like this.
  5. KasimirKid

    KasimirKid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,245
    3,381
    Jun 1, 2018
    The injury was documented in the Seattle newspapers even prior to the fight. I know when I watched the fight years afterward, I was convinced he was unable to use the hand as an effective offensive weapon. All his hard punching was done with his left.

    At this late stage of the game, all we can do is fill in the big gaps about what we don't know with conjecture. But isn't that always the case in this forum? One thing we do know is that Machen was not intimidated by Liston like the rest of his opponents at this time. I think a fight between a healthy Machen and Liston would have been a far more interesting fight. Machen liked to sit on the ropes and wait for openings to counter to the head and body with both hands. I don't think he would have allowed himself to be hit by Liston's left any more if he had two good hands. He would have picked his spots to let the right go. Having survived with Liston when he wasn't at his best, Eddie would have had more confidence the second time around. Obviously, though, Liston would still have to be favored in a rematch.

    Like you, I am fascinated by this fight. Part of it is that it took place in the city where I have lived all my life.
     
    Finkel and Pugguy like this.
  6. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,469
    26,828
    Jun 26, 2009
    He didn’t become mandatory for winning the eliminator. He was offered an eliminator with Ortiz, went to purse bids IIRC and he ran away.

    He also turned down Joshua.

    Guy’s best move was to wait til someone signed a fight and THEN call them out.

    Not to mention him being a PED cheat.
     
  7. Finkel

    Finkel Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,027
    4,795
    Feb 10, 2020
    That's fair enough, I've already posted lengthy rebuttals on Ortiz, Steroids and Povetkin in line with how the WBC have been behaving toward Whyte. But I can understand how from one perspective some may not have sympathy for him. My position has always been looking specifically at the contradictory nature the WBC has acted, effectively screwing him around for years playing the if you just jump through this one last hoop game, over and over again, whilst taking sanctioning fees. Yes, I completely agree with you that the end game was to try and line up a future fight between Whyte and Joshua.
    Well I would say following the breadcrumbs, it is very easy for me to argue that Whyte had on the surface acted in a reasonable way and followed WBC guidelines. The issue was that the WBC has been constantly throwing their guidelines out the window when it came to Whyte and acting in a contradictory manner to keep him away from a title shot. The 80-20% was just an extension of that. A final FU to Whyte if you will. lol

    Personally I think the WBC have had a very obvious agenda to maintain an American champion as long as possible, you could see by Sulaiman's in-ring expression at the end of Fury v Wilder 2 that he was not happy with the outcome of that fight. I think this started before Whyte actually, when they vetoed the idea of a unification between Stiverne and W. Klitschko, and forced the Wilder mandatory upon him as his first fight after winning the belt.

    So whilst you may say "UK fans...", I would say "American fans..." have been happily turning a blind eye to a lot of this.
    Yeah that was another joke of a situation.
     
  8. Finkel

    Finkel Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,027
    4,795
    Feb 10, 2020
    I take it you didn't actually read my post, as I have debunked each of those common narratives that look to paint Whyte as the instigator in his own problems.

    Again, the final eliminator was to be Whyte v Breazeale. Why were the WBC so reluctant to make that fight? Why were they asking Whyte to fight yet another eliminator against Ortiz?
    1) It was to become second mandatory, with no guarantee of a title shot...
    2) Ortiz was ranked below both Whyte and Breazeale
    3) Ortiz was coming off a drugs ban followed by a stoppage loss to Wilder.
    4) The actual final eliminator should have been Breazeale v Whyte, which the WBC finally acknowledged after legal pressure from Whyte.

    And don't forget, basically, Wilder told Whyte that he could avoid him as long as he wanted with WBC blessing. Then later said I will fight you if you beat Ortiz. And instead of the WBC putting their foot down, they allowed the champion to make up the rules? Ludicrous

    As for the Joshua fight offer, do you not think that was all a bit too convenient for Hearn/Joshua?
    i.e. a clear smoke screen so Hearn could go on an American adventure at MSG, whilst keeping the fans on side who'd already put money down on hotels and plane tickets for the Wembley date. As I said, it is on record that Whyte accepted the fight, but Joshua kept adding in caveats. In the end he walked away, Hearn was cornered on this and had to admit as much on film.

    Can you give some examples of this? As that is reminiscent of Wilder's MO. I could very well be wrong, but I don't recall Whyte ever doing that.
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2022
  9. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

    17,500
    28,446
    Aug 22, 2021
    True, we’d have a lot less to talk about if not for the conjecture.

    Machen wasn’t just not intimidated, he was actually disdainful of Liston, in the press and over the course of the fight, wasn’t he? Still, I think he fought a realistically wary fight anyway.

    There was some palpable “feeling” in that fight and you didn’t often see Liston lose his cool, even if ever so slightly.

    You could also see Liston didn’t like Machen performing the old veteran’s “spin” on him - Eddie in manipulative control, ending up behind Liston and hugging him on several occasions - LOL.
     
    KasimirKid and Finkel like this.
  10. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,469
    26,828
    Jun 26, 2009
    If the AJ fight was offered and he didn’t sign the contract, he rejected it.

    You want to talk about PEDs, give me the whitewashed version of Whyte’s failed drug test.

    If he beat Ortiz, he would have gotten the shot. When Dilly Dilly walked away from that one and Ortiz took another fight, Whyte then called him out lol.

    Whyte’s not getting a mandatory was because he turned down an eliminator with Ortiz:

    https://www.*****.net/2019/04/05/dillian-whyte-world-title-explained/

    Whyte in 2020 called out Ortiz and Ortiz accepted, said he’d come to the UK. Dillian kept Luis’ name out of his mouth after that, did not follow through with his challenge.

    Dilly Dilly won the interim title or whatever it’s called by beating Povetkin after being KO’d by him. That’s why he’s getting a shot down — because he split with a washed-up Povetkin. SMH.
     
  11. Finkel

    Finkel Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,027
    4,795
    Feb 10, 2020
    This forum is giving YouTube comments a run for its money in terms of stupidity I see.

    "Dilly Dilly"? Sigh... give your head a shake from me too.

    I suppose if Joshua had contracted for one of Whyte's kidney that would be okay then too. Laughable stance to take.

    As for the PEDs, the WBC stalled him based on a rumour from an on going UKAD investigation. And whether or not you think the outcome was Whyte-washed, there is a little thing called assumed innocence. VADA cleared him who the WBC look to, and beyond that the WBC allowed Molina who was suspended by UKAD to fight Breazeale! So you have no argument, besides "dilly dilly" :deal:

    And speaking of PEDs you are using Ortiz as an example of what exactly? How to navigate the WBC cleanly? Lol

    Btw that is a badly researched article on ***** that you are reading. They left out all the contextual stuff about Stiverne and Breazeale, they also left out the part about Whyte fighting a WBC eliminator in 2016, prior to Breazeale v Molina. They left out the part about Breazeale being on video explaining why he had turned down an offer to fight Whyte, and how Al Haymon would sort something out for him. They also left out the part about Molina's standing in the WBC and his actual UKAD suspension. And they left out the part where the WBC publicly clarified with reporters that Breazeale v Molina was not a final eliminator, and that it was indeed only an eliminator. Because actual reporters understood that Whyte was in line for the final eliminator after winning his half in 2016. So given the article got all that wrong, am I meant to believe what is written in regards to Ortiz v Whyte being a final eliminator because Sulaiman said so.
    "WBC President Mauricio Sulaiman has explained numerous times why Whyte has been bypassed. This is due to the Briton rejecting a final eliminator with Luis Ortiz."​
    Well, that is a crock of sh1te. But, hey, this is a guy who changes his story at the drop of a hat, when past truths become present inconveniences for his org. It is also common knowledge that it was an eliminator to become second mandatory. i.e. more evidence of Sulaiman making up things as he goes along. And none of that contradicts the fact that a final eliminator of Whyte v Breazeale should have been made in 2017, and if not that in 2018...
    TLDR: that article was written in mid-2019...so I don't see what reason they could have for getting so many things so so wrong. Unless it was just a hit piece written to maintain media access with Sulaiman...

    What? So your issue is Whyte had Ortiz' name in his mouth in December 2020 after losing to Povetkin, then instead of fighting Ortiz, he opted for the contracted rematch against Povetkin to put himself back in position for the title?!...lol
    Btw, is this the same Ortiz who lost his pen to fight Joshua, after having Joshua's name constantly in his mouth. The same Ortiz who recently ducked Hrgovic? That Ortiz?
    How any of that is relevant to the WBC's actions between 2017 and 2020 I do not know? smh



    Give it a rest now, okay. I've spent a good amount of time now batting back these empty accusations. So, it may be time to reconsider if you might just be wrong on this one...

    Now if it's all the same to you, I'll catch you all after the fight.
     
  12. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s Full Member

    19,297
    21,304
    Sep 22, 2021
    :lol: No sarcasm radar?
     
  13. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,114
    20,632
    Jul 30, 2014
    I disagree he did “pretty well”. Just rewatched the bout, and didn’t give him a single round aside from point deductions from Liston .

    It’s hard to say he would’ve beaten Liston seeing as he couldn’t even beat Williams.
     
  14. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,349
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Wait there so you're saying what problem could I have with someone being WBC #1 after winning a few 8 rounders then Dave Allen and Ian Lewison. Come off it will you.

    The fact is I have no problem with Whyte getting a shot now but if he was on the scrap heap like Jarrell Miller had been he couldn't complain too much.

    Golovkin won then defended the WBC interim title 4x while Canelo was just messing about before he finally got the title.

    As I said there's a big difference between stone walling based on race and someone being a diva wanting more millions. Hagler wasn't turning down title fights.

    There's literally loads of fighters more hard done to than Whyte over the years who's been given a big push if anything. Also this "WBC eliminator" with Chisora you're talking about you forget to mention that Chisora deserved to win that fight.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  15. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,349
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    How can you say he's been shafted when he's made millions. Other fighters have had hard fights and not got the millions or the title shot.

    Like I said he got offered a title shot but he wanted the millions. He's spoiled a lot of the hype for this fight because he's not happy with the £5 or £6 million he's getting for it.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.