SRL vs Pernel

Nip and tuck fight.

Sugar Ray in a close one

 

To explain that. I think most everyone acknowledges that.

 

Leonard could use his jab and quick footwork to make Pernell come to him. For Whitaker to win he would have to take some chances and open up leaving Leonard counterpunching opportunities. Ray does have a 4 5 inch height advantage. Ray could win like or he could beat him on the inside.

I agree Whitaker could make it ugly.

 

Hit him ? That normally does the trick.

 

He's been here for many years belting out the same garbage about Leonard being prime when he lost to Norris. That's his thing. He used to go under the name of Redrooster, but that's all that has changed.

 

Look you fool, your posts are all over the forum, both as you, and as Red Rooster, going back years.

If I post it, you’ll just claim that you’re not him.

The funniest thing though, is when you tie yourself up in knots without even realising it.

Just the other month on the ‘Hearns vs Calzaghe at SMW’ thread, you said that Hearns was absolutely shot against Leonard. You have also said on numerous occasions, that Hearns was robbed of a victory. So by your own admission, Ray couldn’t beat a shot Hearns 2 years before he fought Norris.

You also say that Marvin Hagler was shot in the 1987 ‘Superfight’ and have questioned Ray's win.

So again, by your own admission, Ray was lucky to get a win over a shot fighter.

So what did that say about Ray?

He could only scrape a gift win and a gift draw over 2 shot fighters in the mid to late 80’s, yet according to you, he wasn’t faded himself in the early to mid 90’s.

He couldn’t legitimately beat a shot Hagler in 1987, but he wasn’t faded himself ten years later against Macho in 1997?

That’s what you’ve claimed.

This is why you’re either an idiot, or an extremely boring troll.

It MAY have been amusing YEARS AGO as Red Rooster, but now it’s just tedious.

You have the knowledge to give everybody a great debate. But you just can’t seem to do it. Instead, you spend hours of your life hijacking any thread on Ray, boring everyone with how he couldn’t beat Norris and Camacho etc.

It’s just a waste of time.

I don’t know why you can’t have a sensible debate.

I promise you that you’d get far more enjoyment out of it.

It’s now got to the stage where if I see that you’ve commented on a thread regarding Ray and Floyd, I don’t even read it. I just skip straight to the next poster.

This is what it’s like reading your garbage: Zzzzzzzzzzz

If you want the last word, then go ahead, it’s yours.

I’m not wasting any more of my time on you.

 

Yes, it’s Rooster.

I posted some links the other month, from a thread from years ago, where he’d typed the exact same things, word for word.

He’s also admitted it to other members.

I don’t know if his act was funny 6/7 years ago, but it’s certainly not any more. It’s just tedious.

 

Just ignore him and reply to the other posters.

He’s not having any more of my time.

 

Just ignore him.

 

Do they? He didn’t. Even when provided with the linked article and quote therein. Literally still pretended that the quote didn’t exist and claimed I made it up. Tbh, I’ve never read any poster take denial so far.

No worries man, just clarifying, thanks for replying.

 

All good bro. I definitely hear you but prob best to leave it up to individual posters as to whether they want to reply or not.

You’re an excellent poster and I liked your last reply to Mr Dunham in which you very even handedly gave credit for his knowledge but with the suggestion that he use it for good instead of evil. LOL.