SRL vs Pernel

Here’s a great quote for you Red Looster:-

“A t*rd by any other name still smells as foul.”

Not Bard, hey? Or, how about, The Taming of the Rooster?

Ray beat Marv. FACT. That was 35 years ago. My goodness, how many nets have you slipped through over the decades? The system has well and truly failed us.

Dynamicpuncher is a fine poster and I said nothing to detract from that fact. I look forward to discussions with him in the future.

Sociopathic twisting of what has actually been said doesn’t cut it. Even Terry would pity you if he ever read your “thoughts”.

Clearly, TOO MUCH RAY for you to handle.

As I’ve said before, Shutter Island treatment is the only recourse here. Not all bad , you get to be Leo DeCap unless you have an irrational axe to grind with him also.

Even buy yourself a spinning top maybe - start it off and if it doesn’t eventually tip but instead keeps spinning, then you know you’re not in the world of reality and need to snap out of it, stat!

 

In my early years here i used to use red for debate practise. He had as many holes as swiss cheese but he kept coming so it gave you a chance to work on a few things. There'd be a bit of humor sneaking into it too and quite a few actually enjoyed it

 

That’s a great take JT.

Like sparring but instead training for debate, sharpen your skills and tactics on a third rater. Maybe even play the rope a dope, let them rant themselves out, no damage done except to themselves and then hit them between the eyes with a stunning counter.

Maybe it’s time for another sea change - MD should respawn and come back under the moniker Joe Grim - takes a licking but keeps on ticking.

 

You've expanded on it better than i ever could have!! That's exactly what it was.

 

Hmmmm, …....sorry to tell you but the shot clock timed out on this and there was far too much dribbling (not least over Norris) beforehand anyway. Consider yourself slam dunked.

 

Though a humble man, I have plenty to boast about.

I don’t crow, that’s Looster speak - YOUR speak - the poster who knows far TOO little.

Get it RIGHT, it’s TOO MUCH RAY, you little plagiarist you. It only takes two neurones to spark an original thought. Perhaps that is two TOO many for you.

YOU keep sticking your beak out and it keeps getting knocked off, such is the poultry nature of your posts.

How many rounds did it take 7-1 favourite Norris to beat Keith Mullings who’d only won about 1 fight in last 4? Ah, that’s right, Terry didn’t stop him, did he? In fact, I seem to recall that it was Terry who was stopped.

TOO little Norris and TOO little Looster. Hahaha.

Now for that Shutter Island treatment. Take a walk down this hospital ward.

[url]https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/sugar-ray-leonard-v-terry-norris-prime-for-prime.570278/page-56[/url]

We need to ease you in. Due to PTSD you will initially reject that it’s you - but it is YOU “Mark”, even if you can’t remember, having pushed your prior history deep down into your unconscious mind.

YOU will plainly see the unmistakable similarities (they’re identical really) in the conduct of, and the opinions expressed, in your previous posts (as Foghorn) and current posts under your “new”, heavily disguised persona - LOL.

In short, it’s the same old cr*p from the same old poster who knows far TOO little….a truly deluded and broken record.

Did you buy that top I mentioned? …..

I have to assume it hasn’t tipped but is instead is still “inexplicably” spinning. Mark, Rooster and/or whatever other personalities you’ve adopted, time to snap out of it man.

 

Ah, the sound of one man cr*pping.

If a tree fell in the woods……would we be lucky enough for it to fall on………?, ah never mind.

Ray stopped Bonds in round 10. You were corrected on that point back then - what?, it’s about 6 years on and you’re still unable to acquire and maintain accurate information, even when it’s spoonfed.

Problematic to say the least.

Yes, I remember Marv Hags comprehensively turning back that uber active, young gun Ray Leonard - great stuff. Totally destroyed Ray’s career, didn’t he? Damn shame that.

And vs Mullings, Terry really did live up to his nick “Terrible” didn’t he? Wow. If only they served him up a young up and comer with an unbeaten record or near enough to. It would’ve been easy peasy. Tezza would’ve surely smashed that hot prospect and put paid to his career.

Instead, Terrible Tezza took the harder road and faced Mullings. Nothing like that “soft touch” Leonard facing and beating Hearns.

Maybe I should pay you double for your sparring services - sure, you’re a 4th rater but an amazing sponge for punishment all the same. Are you a big fan of Joe Grim per chance too?

I’m a bit surprised that your “facility” allows you access to devices to go on to social media platforms and “interact”.

I mean, it’s good I suppose for your “socialisation” but maybe it would be better if they restricted your communications to people from “like facilities”.

There’d be at least a better chance of you guys making “sense” of one another.

Here’s a fella I could hook you up with to talk boxing. He really knows his stuff, enough at least for you to feel well challenged:-

This content is protected

 

I scored Norris/Leonard for Ray close. The Sugar Man by a whisker.

 

Is your point that Norris beat a near prime Leonrd and was a better fighter than Ray ?

 

You did bring Hags into it as an analogy in an attempt to falsely underrate/denigrate Leonard. Ray stopped Bonds in 10 NOT 11. So many flaws in your game.

There are no emotional appeals, only logical. There’s been no infantile posting from this end - but you yourself have made numerous submissions that reside very much in that realm.

You’ve been accommodated with being taken seriously but you’ve blown it time and again.

You totally ignore irrefutable counter points with black and white evidence in tow - and the criterion you apply to Ray, you blatantly do not apply to the fighters that you PERSONALLY favour.

With only 1 fight in 5 years prior to, Ray fought infrequently since the Hags fight at which time he was already 30. Even Norris identified Ray’s OBVIOUS deteriorations BEFORE they fought. Ferdie Pacheco identified Ray’s further deteriorations during the course of the fight - as did ALL the post fight write ups.

Prime Ray would be far TOO MUCH RAY for Norris -who was what, about 30 yo when a none too compelling challenger, 7-1 underdog, Mullings cleaned his clock?

Post seriously and maybe you’ll be taken seriously, otherwise, don’t moan in all hypocrisy.

I don’t have any boxing related nightmares or obsessive compulsive attachments to fighters I personally like or dislike.

Of course I can’t speak for Loudon but as he carries himself, I doubt that he does also.

And why bring up Loudon when he isn’t posting on this right now? - see how your duality and hypocrisy just keep giving.

About the only potential nightmare I can imagine is checking message alerts and seeing yet another reply from Mark Dunham - enough to make anyone wake up in a lather of sweat. Hahahehe.

C’mon Mark, all good fun - if you can’t stand the heat (that you turned up), then get out of the kitchen.