Do you think the judging in Canelo vs Bivol was corrupt/biased

Biased. He is a well known fighter and that affects opinion. Corruption? If we believe that then what else can we believe?

 

Home cooking / home crowd influences the judges always.

now adelay Bird that chic is corrupt.

 

This is why I’m big on criticizing fighters who don’t finish strong in the last 3 rounds and scream robbery.. Brian Castano was up 6-3 vs Charlo and lost the last 3 rounds clearly which made the fight a draw.. According to these payed off judges, Bivol had to win the last 3 rounds to win the fight and he did just that without taking his foot off the gas.. Kambosos did the same thing vs Teofimo giving them no possible way to give that fight to Teofimo.. You have to finish strong when you’re the clear b side because all the bias scoring will go the A-side way..

 

If those judges were corrupt, they were also inept cause they failed to accomplish their objective.

 

What? Nah, it's not like Canelo has a long history of suspicious scorecards or anything..............

 

The judges might have been biased, maybe there was a brutal uppercuts bias.

 

It was corrupt obviously.

Bivol had to win about 11 rounds to get 7-5 score. If he had won a clear 8-4 the judges would have given it Canelo 8-4 ! That's pure corrupt.

Bias and corrupt are same thing when biased favouring the 'cash cow' fighter. Possibly not actually direct bribing (parcel of cash under a table) but corrupt judges operate dishonesty to further career and please the guys with the money. obvious this happens

 

Don't be a casual bro. Better to understand how judges score prize fights than to live in corruptive ignorance.

 

Its The Corrupted Las Vegas Boxing Mafia - Them Termite judges

 

All it needed was an Adelaide Byrd and we would be thinking differently.!!!

 

It's probably bias on the verge of corruption. It's unfair, is what it is. So basically Bivol had to punch the **** out of Alvaroids just to claim a 10-9 round. The judges cheat up until a point where they just can't.

 

Then you are blind or biased as hell, as well as your son.
Which exactly round you scored for your fanhero Clenelo ?
There is no ***** way he won anything more than 3 rounds, and in reality he won between 0-2 rounds.

 

This 100%.

 

Corruption at its highest, and people claiming otherwise are either blind, biased or plain and simple - stupid.

Obviously even with the judges are paid they will make it looks legit, and can't score a 12-0 fight a draw or a close win for the "right" guy.

You can say biased, when me, you and some drunk fans is scoring the fight, and they have agenda. Or when the fight is actually super close and the judges have bias towards a certain style, let's say aggressive or power punching.

We are talking about professional and so call "best of the best" judges on the planet. You cannot talk about bias here.

They were clearly paid off, just like in every single Canelo match. He started the fight with 4-0 on the scorecards, if you cannot see that they were paid off, then again you are blind, biased or stupid.
First round was clear Bivol round 14-5 punches even on the d***** compubox(yeah the guy on it was probably paid off, but even he can't do much about it).

Even if the judges are corrupt(as they were) and paid off big time, all they could is make the fight close on the scorecards.
Anything else and everything would have been exposed and people would have riot.
Kinda the same story with GGG. GGG was dominating the majority of the rounds, and Canelo shows for 30 seconds, and they scored the rounds for him.
Also the famous 10-2 by Adalaide Byrd.

There should be a commission that investigate such a criminal scorecards and there is also laws about corruption and so. And every single sh*** like this fight should be investigated and put this corrupt piece of ***** responsible, otherwise the sport is going nowhere.

 

You can't even explain why the "paid and corrupt" judges didn't at least give Canelo a draw but run around calling others "blind, biased or stupid" LOL