Canelo Bivol rounds 1-4 - "close fight" comprehensively debunked debunked

Dunno

Dont care

 

https://i.imgur.com/bOWdsW6.mp4

That's quite the descriptor!!

Whatever you say "jolt" boy.

 

WHAT??? LOL he thought it was borderline BEFORE he looked at my clip. Then deemed that my clip made him realize it landed, the same clip that caused ellerbe to say it was blocked.

 

By the way your video editing skills are WHACK. That video is all over the place.

 

Can't wait till ellerbe gets back in here, he's gonna take you to task on the jolting stuff.

 

It's irrelevant and I've already answered read my post's.
I don't care if Q said it knocked Canelo's head off his shoulders. The last several pages of this thread have been about whether individual punches are scoring or not. Now because you have been a clown and actually provided a clip that makes that more decisive in Q''s favor then it's irrelevent. You messed up I said it was 50.50 before but you yourself provided a clear angle of it snapping Canelo's head back so that's a good jab. Now you are desperate to try and deflect it onto how Q described it which nonsense and irrelevent. Otherwise I will qiote your posts where you clearly overstate and lie about the clips you provided. So don't go there Shadow I'm called Exocet for a reason and if you don't know what that is then Google is your friend...

 

It's just Shadow being a true weasel and using the appeal to authority fallacy like he did using Rummy's score of 8-4 to justify 7-5 being reasonable and fair. Shadow is the king of fallacies and uses them constantly someteimes several times in 1 post. I couldn't do that even if I tried. It doesn't matter what Ellerbe thinks it's another opinion no greater or lesser than anyone elses. The fact if you get one person to agree doesn't then make your position correct that's why it's a fallacy in the first place.