What about Wallin's drab performances against Kamil Sokolowski and then against Dominic Brezeale, labouring to a points victory over a fighter with no confidence who Joshua stopped in 7 rounds when he was unbeaten ?
I agree he looked better than he did in the few fights before. What concerned me was how crude his offence was when Chisora sat on the ropes to recover. That version of Del Boy was the worst I’d seen. He looked spent after a round and a half. The fact Hearn said he wanted him in with Wilder after made me realise how little he values the health of his fighters.
Those wins were a few fights ago and he has ages awfully since then. It is also important when a fighter beat someone. It’s like David Allen beating Kevin McBride (not a gimmee!) then Mitch saying he’d beat Tyson.
Everyone knows who really won the Helelnius fight - similar to Lewis vs Hollyfield 1 and Fury vs Wilxer 1 etc. Beating Takm, Spzilka Price Heleinius is a better record than just beating Breazeale.
It sure is, but Wallin should beat all of them given the opportunity Im not counting Helenius as its not a win
Are you factoring in Chisora's precipitous decline though? What he did to a multiple KO losses Szpilka 3 years ago or losing an unfortunate decision to a Euro level guy over a decade ago may be of zero relevance now. He hasn't won any of his last three fights and looked like trash against Parker last time out. And if you compare Wallin's performance against Fury with Chisora's or Whyte's (Parker's conqueror) Wallin looks levels above. A relatively inactive Whyte notoriously pulled out of the Wallin fight and never rescheduled before getting destroyed by Fury so even he knows there was a high chance of losing to Wallin, even at home with A-side advantage.
I disagree. I think Wallin beats Szpilka but not a prime Takam (Takam would outwork him for comfortable points decision). Chisora would very likely beat too and Parker definitely would beat him in my opinion.