Fury should quit after fighting Joshua

Usyk or he’s ducking.

 

Who's Joshua?

 

Some thoughts:

1) This is extremely old news, now. Why are we talking about it?
2) Joshua has to convincingly beat Usyk before this is plausible.
3) Joshua is going to lose to Usyk worse this time, so it is not possible.
4) Usyk would be the fight.
5) If Joshua wants a pay-out, he could build himself back up after the second Usyk loss with a few good fights, and then go in and lose to Fury.
6) Fury will also lose to Usyk, will he want to fight Joshua to determine second best?

 

Why Joshua and not Usyk ?

 

You have just made a bigger goddamned fool of yourself that even Dubblechin.

Undisputed cruiserweight champion and unified heavyweight champion in 19 fights with wins over six other titleists, all in their hometowns, without a single controversial fight or even knockdown.

If Usyk decided to retire today, he would be an ATG.

 

this

 

this

 

He's entitled to retire whenever he wants but if he chooses to only fight the winner if it's AJ than he is 100% ducking Usyk and I am a Fury fan. I agree that there's not much left to prove other than fighting the winner.

 

1) Agree
2) Disagree even if Joshua loses which is not guaranteed then it's still a huge fight in the UK for both men.
3) Irrelevant as explained above it's still a big money fight. Also it's heavyweight and nobody knows what will happen. AJ could win by robbery for instance. what then?
4) I like Usyk but he's nowhere near as big as a fight with AJ. that's just fact and achievements are irrelevant as only hardcore fans are aware or care.
5) Fallacy logic.already explained that even if Joshua loses to Usyk which again is if. then he still generates far more money a defeat doesn't erase that overnight.
6) All your false assumptions are based off results going in the direction you think. Last time I checked I've never seen you state that you can predict the future and what qualification you have for making these assertions.

The point is nobody knows what will happen and those who do with Heavyweights will be wrong half the time at least.
What can't be denied is even after a loss AJ for better or worse is one of the biggest draws in boxing full stop. So obviously that and Fury's confidence makes that the most logical fight to make. Remembering Fury has shown concern with retaining his unbeaten record and is unlikely to change unless he sees Usyk age over night.

 

Whereas I respect your opinions, I don't think the fight would be that huge in the UK. At least not as big as it was. At the end of the day, people don't pay to see a loser like they do a winner.

It is not my "assumption," that Usyk is going to win, and it is not based on results going in. I picked Usyk to win the first because he is as superior technician, a better volume puncher, and has a better chin. I am not sayin git is set in stone, but it isn't an "assumption," either. It is an educated extrapolation.

 

It is not a matter of dispute. A vast majority of the boxing community would consider him thus, and thus, he would be. A simple minded git like you can always disagree...they always do.