Joe Joyce vs Frank Bruno

Besides the point...

Maybe read sometimes, thinking clearly isn't a strong point but if you at least understood what's being said you might actually be able to have some kind of conversation.

McCall was lucky that he met Lewis on a day where Lewis wasn't at his best - remember we're talking about an ATG level fighter here, quite possibly the H2H GOAT at heavy... But you've still got to be able to capitalise on that bad day and McCall was good enough to do it.

Dubois and Joyce haven't been anywhere near someone as dangerous as that, they're still slumming it with journeymen (Dubois) and gatekeepers (Joyce).

You're talking absolute gibberish, man.

 

You are right i can`t take anyone seriously who thinks Josh Warrington beats Naseem Hamed

 

McCall and Bruno were just basic.

 

To be honest I think putting Daniel Dubois down as a better fighter than Frank Bruno tops that... By some way.

 

Hamed was not a top draw fighter, I don`t care about Warrington, Naz was overrated.

 

No cause Naz was far better than Bruno P4P.

 

And Dubois is a ****ing prospect... His best win is against the absolutely pathetic Trevor Bryan for Christ's sake.

You cannot seriously expect anyone to believe you rate a prospect who won a paper belt against a glorified journeyman above two guys who've won proper belts at heavy ?!

 

And i don`t care what you think your knowledge of boxing is laughable

 

That's the correct answer. Bruno could hit fragging hard and was technically not too bad. A hell of a jab on him. If joyce wins he's going to have to eat a lot of shots until FB gasses mid fight. He might not look too good even if he wins.

 

Dear lord!

 

Yep

 

Naz`s fundamentals were awful.

 

Joyce eventually catches up to Frank and finishes him. I can see Joe taking Franks shots but not the other way around.

 

If Bruno hit Joyce with the right hands hammer continually got through then it would have been over in 2

 

Pierre Coetzer took a lot of right hands from Frank.