Who is/was more skilled Crawford or Pernell

Dear oh Dear!!!!

 

Please just ignore this fool.

He has shown no willingness to learn anything.

He is here to tell everyone how much he knows and how wrong everyone is...

Beat it, nerd.

 

He obviously doesn't get enough attention in his personal life.

He doesn't care if it's negative attention.

 

Ennis is very talented but lets wait to see what he does first.
Your mention of boxers that haven't really faced anyone yet is crazy.
Vasquez holds a win over Davis and Winky alone is more then Ennis has done and your asking if he would be competitive?
Buddy is a multiple division champion with over SIXTY wins and your asking if he could hold his own? You do realize who trained Buddy right?
Spence would have had MAJOR problems with Buddy because Buddy moved ALOT.
Ennis I have to see in against a very top fighter before I make any decisions.

 

Jesus H,

 

Crawford?

 

Terrence is exceptional. But what you’ve got to understand, is that despite what that fool Betyabeatyaup says, today’s era wasn’t better than the 90’s, and the 90’s was absolutely stacked.

To give you an idea of how stacked it was, James Toney never made it to the P4P no.1 spot, despite being undefeated in almost 50 fights, with wins over Mike McCallum, Reggie Johnson, Michael Nunn, Tim Littles and Iran Barkley etc.

Although Terrence looks great, he’s not got a great resume.

He may have made the top 10, but top 5 would have been hard.

Of course, it’s all subjective, and the rankings are obviously based on skills and resume.

I’d have to check the P4P ratings to see if he realistically could have held a place. But the competition would have been fierce.

Unless you want to check them out yourself, I’ll post the Ring’s ratings for the 90’s when I get back from work.

 

It’s painful reading his posts.

I’m still hoping that he’s trolling us all.

 

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_Pound_For_Pound--1990s

Basically a mix of Olympians.

 

Great post.

 

Thanks mate!

That’s awesome.

It’s saved me a job.

Anyone who believes that the sport has progressed over the last 30 years needs to study this.

There’s been zero progression.

It’s just laughable.

If we look at these lists, where would Terrence fit in?

Is there a top 5 place for him for any of these years?

 

1999 was crazy.

 

BoxingIQ Should study this then end this ridiculous thread

 

He is not trolling. This is textbook Dunning-Kruger.