I don't understand this Paranoia of Usyk being robbed vs Joshua.

The first 6 rounds against Povetkin were close even to the advantage of the Russian and the judges had AJ well ahead (4-2 and 5-1).
Like Canelo vs Bivol, Usyk dominated too clearly to be robbed.

 

That guy must have Canelo beating GGG syndrome or something. What an idiot to think that Usyk would be robbed.This happens all the time, people become invested in a fighter winning so much they go out of their way to try and claim a robbery. Then when their robbery prediction doesn't happen, they have too much pride to admit they were wrong and end up looking even more stupid trying spin what happened from there. Like "but but the judges were still trying to rob him it was just too much of domination for them to do it". It's beyond cringe what these robbery projectors try to pull, remember what happened with Canelo Bivol, people swore that it would be impossible for Canelo to lose a decision in Vegas, that all Canelo had to do was still be standing after 12 rounds and he's guaranteed to win. Then Bivol decisions him in a close fight, and a big chunk of this forum's delusional mindset gets proven wrong then it's like "but but it was a shutout 12-0". Then when you try and talk sense into them, they glitch out and refuse to admit rounds 1-4 were even close let alone Canelo rounds.

Many of these idiots don't even know how to score, many of them didn't even know the legal scoring zones, I caught many of these fools who thought that shoulder shots couldn't be scored and it was hilarious watching them backtrack. We're dealing with hopeless idiots like take a Wiz kid, little punk boys who love to project judging conspiracies on to us, who never admit when they're wrong, who accuse you of not knowing how to score lol, and claim that you're "naive" to think that Usyk wasn't gonna get robbed. It's just crazy how deluded these people are. And I guarantee you, that IF Joshua outboxes Usyk (not saying it's gonna happen, but if it does) these people will use that to say they were right about Usyk getting robbed all along rather than admit he lost. These kinds of people have no shame, all they care about is being right and will spin anything to that end. Just be aware of the kind of mental tricks these clowns will try to pull on you.

 

Why does the perception anonymous posters on a boxing forum have of Joshua bother you so much @Vegan Beast ?

I’ve never seen anything like the way you’re fixated on it

 

It's not a dig at Joshua it's just how boxing works unfortunately. The money fighter is favoured.

Same for Ginger nuts and other big box office stars (whether you rate him or not Joshua is still a box office star)

So yeah we could see a robbery. But I reckon Usyk will again win so conclusively to make that unlikely

 

Except when Bivol, not a box office star, won a UD over Canelo in a close fight.

And when GGG got a gift draw against Canelo after being outclassed the first time.

 

@Vegan Beast see what I mean. They always find a way to spin what happened, even if what they say will happen doesn't.

 

Why i already mention that AJ is judge favor, this is some nonsenses b.c. The fight wasn't neither close, neither competitive. AJ clearly beats him. Parker did next to nothing.

 

It was 7-5 or 8-4 for AJ. 11-1 and 10-2 cards were atrocious.

 

Your a clown he would of had dodgy decisions if he needed them but he knocked most out he had a dodgy ref for Parker who is ****

he is Matchroom boy lol and you are going on about no dodgy decision Matchroom gave England a bad name for just that you bloody idiot

Ussyk schooled him and it was still close when they read it out your having a laugh for **** sake mate

 

Lol if the Bivol fight was close then I'm a billionaire with the looks of Brad Pitt.

I suspect you're trolling good sir.

 

@Vegan Beast see what I mean, Bivol wins a decision in Vegas, completely disintegrating their judging conspiracies, so now they have to move the goalposts, after being proved wrong, so predictably now it can't have been even remotely close. Now it's "but but Bivol dominated" "but but Usyk dominated" and now I must be trolling by pointing out that Canelo won rounds 1-4 and round 9. Or short of that, at least admitting that round 1-4 were close. But no, firmly attached to their robbery delusions, to save face, now Bivol and Usyk had to have dominated. This is some of most obvious backtracking and spin you will ever see. But its core it's paranoia just like the OP said. Paranoia birthed out of over the top fanboyism for a certain fighter. This what happens when you get overinvested in a certain fighter winning, you create built-in excuses and when they don't pan out, then you resort to spinning what happened in order to spin what happened so that you weren't wrong. When they go down this road, it's important to call them out on their BS.

 

The funniest part is that it’s all so obvious, and they are so dumb, that they believe they’re fooling everyone, along with themselves. Bunch of children.

 

As i said, naive as hell

 

Only thing mental here is you