Arum admits PPV is dead. What does this mean for boxing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sheikh, Jul 24, 2022.



  1. Sheikh

    Sheikh Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,908
    812
    Jun 4, 2007
    Fighthype has some interviews with Bob Arum posted in the last 24 hours where he admits PPV is dying. He admits this is what is causing the delay in Spence and Crawford agreeing to their fight, as it will likely lead to a loss in money. He said that there is too much piracy nowadays. He says that a model in the future may be that PPV prices come down, to around $25 like they are in the UK. He says this is a risk though and it may not work either. As it currently stands, $80 for a PPV is around 4-5 months of streaming subscriptions (Netflix, HBO, etc) so not a good value proposition and he admits this may be turning down people from buying Pay per views.

    What is interesting is without PPV, you will only see fighters cherry-pick and fight bums as it will not be economical; and promoters will not want to take a loss, on fighting name fighters.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. AliHolmesMayweather

    AliHolmesMayweather New Member Full Member

    76
    128
    Jul 23, 2022
    PPV prices need to be lowered or the undercards need to be stacked.
     
  3. sasto

    sasto Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,177
    15,690
    Aug 5, 2020
    But then why do we have that situation now?

    If you look at it from the other side, no PPV money (or reserving it for rare, truly remarkable showdowns) means less reward for building up a 30-0 record before fighting anyone with a pulse and it decreases the difference between someone who is 30-0 vs 30-1.

    If you just live off TV ratings and ticket sales then you have to put on a good show, it can't just have one good performer because people will change the channel since they didn't sink $80 in.
     
  4. Snails

    Snails Active Member Full Member

    1,394
    1,661
    May 26, 2021
    $19,99 for a PPV is reasonable and would do wonders for boxings waning popularity.
     
  5. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior VIP Member Full Member

    33,223
    10,907
    Apr 19, 2010
    i dont listen to arum
    one day a mans good the next hes bad
    one day hes lying the next hes telling the truth
    one minute khans better than brook next minute oh wait lol
    **** off bob
     
    dcb154, Smokin Bert, HolDat and 3 others like this.
  6. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    91,173
    25,460
    Jan 18, 2010
    The original model isn't dying. The variation they created of it is dying.
    Back in the day there were only a couple of fights that were PPV, and usually with other great fights supporting it.
    Nowadays the main supporting fights on such a card are all PPV on their own, and the whole issue of overpaying boxers has taken its toll.

    PPV should have died out long ago with the subscription channels out there.
     
  7. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,627
    2,265
    Apr 17, 2009
    Always stunned me how much PPV is in USA
     
  8. Guerra

    Guerra Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,174
    3,885
    May 23, 2020
    Definitly. I would not pay more than 20 euro's for a fight. And that has to be a hell of a fight.
     
    BEATDOWNZ likes this.
  9. JOKER

    JOKER Froat rike butterfry, sting rike MFER! banned Full Member

    16,535
    18,011
    Dec 18, 2019
    I've always said that if they lowered the PPV price to $49.95 for big fights, they'd sell a whole lot more and make it up in volume.

    Golovkin-Clenelo is worth $49.95, but not $89.95.

    Tier 1 — $49.95
    • Clenelo Vs. Golovkin
    • Fury Vs. Joshua Vs. Usyk
    • Crawford Vs. Spence
    Tier 2 — $39.95
    • Tank Vs. Ryan
    • Lomachenko Vs. Anyone
    • Spence Vs. Anyone
    Tier 3 — $29.95
    • Inoue Vs. Anyone
    • Tank Vs. Anyone
    • Ryan Vs. Anyone
    • Chocolatito Vs. Estrada
    • Crawford Vs. Anyone
    The rest should be free.
     
  10. Rollin

    Rollin Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,840
    4,241
    Nov 17, 2021
    Stop PPV locking garbage fight and actually bother to make a good undercard? I would pay the price for an 3-5 hours of good commentary/studio and fights, but that's not what you typically pay for. Not at all.
     
    kirk and Reinhardt like this.
  11. FuMaster

    FuMaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,909
    1,062
    Jun 10, 2016
    Greed really. I remember when music was expensive and napster became popular. Oh no, the recording industry and artists will never make money. Then we got services like iTunes, Spotify that made music affordable to the masses for $10 a month. Why the hell can't they do the same in boxing? They will never stamp out illegal streams, but a whole heck of a lot money can still be made if they bring prices down to a reasonable level and get back paying fans.
     
  12. The G-Man

    The G-Man Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,718
    2,819
    Jul 24, 2020
    What is reasonae for you might not be reasonable for somebody else.
    It s not an exact science.
     
  13. Puroresu_Fan

    Puroresu_Fan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,802
    6,596
    Apr 6, 2016
    It's not dead as ufc still achieves plenty of ppv buys.
     
  14. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,273
    15,985
    Jun 25, 2014
    I think what Bob is saying is that PPV is dying because people are able to steal it so easily.

    You have to remember, when Bob Arum began, the fights you paid to watch on a screen were closed circuit fights.

    Each individual had to buy a ticket. You had to go to a theater or a convention center to watch the fight on a big screen.

    There was no home viewing. Bob Arum always hated PPV because he knew people were paying one price and would invite friends over ... and those friends weren't paying the full amount.

    (Bob was like Netlix being angry with sharing passwords before Netflix existed.)

    The reaction of promoters to this, in the States at least, was to keep raising the price for those actually buying the PPVs to cover the losses of those who weren't buying but were watching illegally.

    The prices went up so much that the Mayweather-Pac fight in the US was $100 per pay-per-view.

    Despite the fact that it was wildly successful, with Floyd and Manny picking up roughly $350 million together in purse money, I'm sure Bob just saw it as a loss because of how much they could've made if everyone watching had actually paid full price.

    In fact, I remember when Oscar De La Hoya was nearing the peak of celebrity, for the first Chavez fight, Arum WOULDN'T put the fight on PPV. He only aired it on Closed Circuit ... so in order to see it people had to physically buy a ticket and enter a building or establishment to watch it.

    At the time, he said he "wished" they could go back to closed circuit for all big fights because he didn't like people inviting friends over to watch fights and he didn't get a cut from those people.

    But fans didn't like the idea of having to go to a movie theatre to watch a fight when they'd gotten used to having friends over and watching at home.

    If, like Netflix, he could figure out a way for each person watching to pay the same price, he'd do that. We even saw movie people (producers/directors/etc.) during Covid go ballistic on streaming services like HBO MAX, Disney+ and Netflix for airing first-run movies directly on their streaming service because they (producers/directors) were supposed to get a cut of first weekend ticket sales and there were no ticket sales.

    The big corporations can't figure it out. Neither can Arum.

    It's almost become cyclical. When closed circuit seemed to top out, Don King found leaders of third-world countries to finance fights, and the purses kept getting bigger. When cable came about, and you could pipe fights directly into homes everywhere, they went to that. When streaming began, that seemed much easier than laying a lot of cable lines. So they went to that. Now that everyone can find a stream, Eddie Hearn is back to finding one Saudi Oil prince to pay for basically the whole thing.

    Until then, they might just have to wait for the next new tech.

    Or, for really big fights, they may just go "BACKWARDS" and make everyone watch big fights in theaters again.

    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-05-24-sp-7781-story.html
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2022
  15. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,831
    15,151
    Oct 4, 2016

    Totally agree, the main event is always preceded by a bunch of 4 rounders with guys from Guatemala and Kentucky with club fights that ESPN wouldn't show.