Hard to choose between the two so I’ll go with Rucky Norrisiano. Are you feeling Rucky punk? Well do ya?
So when the television commentator talks, are the words going to come five seconds after he opens his mouth like in the old 1970's Martial Arts movies?
Love those movies, the Bruce Lee imposters, and the classic titles like The Master of the flying Guillotine, Shoguns Assassin ,The Five Deadly Venoms, Five Fingers of Death, 36th Chamber of Shaolin. The names of those films alone told you exactly what you were about to watch!!!!! Black Belt Theatre began at 1300 hrs , usually over at 1500hrs on Saturdays, right in time for the NBC,CBS, and ABC Boxing matches lol. Great times for this impressionable young man!!!!!
We have footage of that bout,they fought in a Colosseum abd Lee won after adjusting. He killed Norris.
Doubtful. Lee was decades ahead of his time in his thinking on fighting concepts, not tied down too any particular style or discipline. Where Norris was of the more traditionally oriented Korean Style of Martial Arts (Tang Soo Doo) Norris really didn't start branching out to other styles until after Way(Return) of The Dragon . Give me the fighter that is flexible in his training, and is "Using what is "Useful" in his fighting discipline regardless of where it came from and in peak physical condition , Over the fighter who is excellent and an expert in one traditionally rigid fighting style. Lee wouldn't have a very big physical disadvantage against Norris at both fighters peak conditioning weight.