never proved head to head he was better. This isn't soccer and goal differential. You have to win the rubber match. Much like Joshua vs fatso.
Have to ? Who decided that ? He Knocked Rahman out cold in a rematch to take back his championship and Rahman never wanted a 3rd fight anyway
He lost via massive headbutt to Holyfield. Had they called that fight fairly i'm sure he wanted a rematch. Dumb ass statement. Guess only brits win in 1-1 series.
You're not making sense. Rahman fought Holyfield after Lewis did and Holyfield was ahead on points anyway
Bet you've never seen it. Too young, just looked it up online. BtW, a win over Holyfield puts him right back in position for fight with Lewis. You aren't making sense.
Take a 5 year period of Lewis prime and put out the best names from it in which were involved in championship fights from that time and we can start talking...
What are you babbling about? The 90's were far deeper than now and most of the fights actually got made. The only fighters from this era who actually took all challengers going for undisputed are Usyk and Joshua. Fury and Wilder not so much.....very weak resumes considering the ATG status given by some.
Wrong. I've seen the fight 2 or 3 times. He never beat Holyfield. Holyfield was ahead on the cards before the fight was stopped. 1 had Rahman winning but it was bs. Rahman never wanted a 3rd fight with Lewis anyway. I don't see a link that says otherwise. Quit taking out your ass
I bet you have. Rahman 's thoughts are now provable by links? Talking out ones ass seems to be your specialty.
Lmao, Holyfield, Bowe, prime Byrd has a shot considering he was way past it and still stayed in there with Povetkin until his corner stopped the fight. Mercer on a good night is levels above Takam who gave Povetkin fits. 90s Tyson pre Holyfield beats Povetkin. Tua would brutally KO Povetkin while down on the cards, and Ibeabuchi would give Povetkin a very hard fight, possibly even win