#1 Muhammad Ali #2 Joe Louis #3 Lennox Lewis #4 Floyd Patterson #5 Rocky Marciano #6 Evander Holyfield #7 Wladimir Klitschko #8 Gene Tunney #9 Sonny Liston 10 Tyson Fury Why do you agree? Why don't you agree? https://boxrec.com/en/ratings?r[rol...s]=&r[division]=Heavyweight&r[country]=&r_go=
The rankings of Patterson and Tunney will raise the most eyebrows. In Patterson's case I can at least see why a statistical approach would place him high.
I don't know where to start really, so I'll begin here: Patterson and no Dempsey? Tunney and no Holmes? Liston and no Foreman? Even a pure statistical approach is not usually that bad!
I'm with you. Melio Bettina is listed as the 40th best heavyweight ever. And he was only ranked at heavyweight for two years during the mid 40s. Who knew? This content is protected This content is protected
As others have said, it is a statistical approach. For the most part it identifies the head to head monsters, such as Louis, Ali and Lewis. We can perhaps give it a pass for missing men like Jack Johnson and Jack Dempsey, based on the fog of their era. It completely misses Larry Holmes, which is a serious omission, with no similar excuse It also gets triggered by men like Patterson, who have impressive statistics on paper, but clearly weren't as dangerous as some of the other men on the list.
I’m ok with the top three but from there things go down hill. As much as I love Floyd Patterson and respect him, there’s no way he’s the 4th best heavy of all time. As others have mentioned they don’t have Holmes in their top 10 which I find a tad bizarre. Tunney was a great fighter p4p but I wouldn’t have him in the heavyweight top 10. Tyson Fury is a head to head monster but his resume is too thin to make the list right now. There are other discrepancies but I’ll stop there