Based on styles, who would have a better chance against Hearns at 147: Spence, Crawford, or Ennis?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by BoxingIQ, Aug 18, 2022.


  1. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,114
    987
    Nov 6, 2017
    Honestly, I think Ennis would have the best chance (based on talent). Ennis has shown the ability to fight from all ranges, his footwork is amazing, best jab in the game, best switch-hitter, and he is the hardest puncher P4P right now. The second would be Spence due to their ability to fight in the pocket (Barkeley and Hagler showed that Hearns cannot fight well in the pocket)/ Thoughts? I think Crawford gets topped Duran style in the second, even though I rank Crawford higher at 147.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,563
    May 4, 2017
    Spence is nowhere near as strong or as power as Barkley and Hagler both of them would have over-powered him.
     
  3. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,114
    987
    Nov 6, 2017
    P4P no. Spence bears Barkley. Haglee vs Spence is 50/50. I'd favor Hagler against Spence due to size.
     
  4. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,563
    May 4, 2017
    Hagler had a more proven chin and went toe to toe with bangers like Hearns and Mugabi, Spence has never faced anything like that, he also had better head movement and combo punching.