Wilder is an absolute fraud + comparison

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by marcosqbit, Aug 18, 2022.


  1. marcosqbit

    marcosqbit New Member Full Member

    49
    49
    Aug 14, 2022
    the definition of first rate is that they must have at least 4 stars when fighting each other on the boxrec.
    ...
    it is not important if he can score points for himself. The thing is that he can't do anything but swing at windmills and the fact that he hasn't been knocked out more than once is due to his height and bad opponents.
    ...
    yes i admit he has won a few times due to quality boxing but against bad opponents except super old Ortiz
     
  2. ShortRound

    ShortRound Active Member banned Full Member

    798
    467
    Jun 6, 2022
    "the definition of first rate is that they must have at least 4 stars when fighting each other on the boxrec."

    Boxrec is a very rough guide, the algorithm is highly questionable. But by that standard, Breazeale and Duhaupas are also "1st rate" Wilder opponents are they not?

    Also, why is 4 stars "1st rate" and not 5 stars?

    "The thing is that he can't do anything but swing at windmills"

    Complete rubbish. Watch the full fights or even just the KO replays.

    "the fact that he hasn't been knocked out more than once is due to his height and bad opponents."

    Wilder's been KO'd twice. He wasn't KO'd by his non-Fury opponents because he's less vulnerable to that level of opposition than Lewis (one-punched twice by fringe contenders) Vitali (injury retirement against Byrd) Wlad (stopped three times by a journeyman and two fringe contenders) or AJ (quit against a fringe contender).

    "except super old Ortiz"

    Unlike the even older Povetkin, Pulev and Wlad that AJ beat...
     
  3. marcosqbit

    marcosqbit New Member Full Member

    49
    49
    Aug 14, 2022
    you are an ultra stupid demagogue.
    ...
    We can classify Breazeale in the first rate, but then we would have to count him to Joshua as well :p Duhaupas never beat anyone from first rate except Charr.
    ...
    first rate are 4 stars or 5 stars. This is to make it a wider zone and more opponents can be included in it....try to think a little dickhead.
    ...
    "except super old Ortiz" -> Unlike even older Povetkin, Pulev and Wlad, whom AJ beat... -> age at match:
    Povetkin - 39
    Pulev 39
    Ortiz 40
     
  4. ShortRound

    ShortRound Active Member banned Full Member

    798
    467
    Jun 6, 2022
    "you are an ultra stupid demagogue."

    Yet you struggle with basic maths and are flagrantly dishonest.

    Age at time of match:

    Ortiz 1 38 years old
    Povetkin 39 years old
    Pulev 39 years old
    Wlad 41 years old

    "Duhaupas never beat anyone from first rate except Charr."

    Helenius was rated as 4 star until recently but they changed the algorithm, Szpilka was too when Wilder beat him.

    You've moved the goalposts: Duhaupas is a 4 star rated Wilder opponent, so he's "1st rate" by your own definition, like Scott.

    "first rate are 4 stars or 5 stars. This is to make it a wider zone and more opponents can be included in it"

    I see. You made the "1st rate" list longer by including guys who are intuitively 2nd rate by your own boxrec standard. Wlad and Takam/Scott are all "1st rate" wins lol. Meaningless rubbish.
     
    pacas likes this.
  5. tee_birch

    tee_birch Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,791
    4,973
    Jul 6, 2014
    Funniest thing here is that you think Ortiz is only 40. My guess would be mid 50s
     
    Wizbit1013 and lordlosh like this.
  6. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,145
    Apr 4, 2012
    I'm just curious if he's lost a step after the Fury fights. If he has Helenius has a chance. I'd written him off as a contender but he seems to have come out from his decade long slumber of struggling to impress against journeyman. Conditioning better, volume higher. Moving a bit easier. But it can also end with one Wilder right hand as we know.
     
  7. cleglue1

    cleglue1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,561
    1,677
    Dec 7, 2015
    Wilder is back talking to "Old Media", must have been the ass whoopins. Looking like Ortiz 3 will be in the making...sad.
    This content is protected
     
  8. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,376
    6,930
    Feb 5, 2016
    You shouldn't be saying "we don't know til they fight" when talking about a fighter with 10 title defenses. Thats the point everyone is making here.
     
    lordlosh likes this.
  9. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,108
    37,758
    Jul 4, 2014
    This is an excellent point well made.
     
    lordlosh likes this.
  10. BEATDOWNZ

    BEATDOWNZ Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,382
    1,045
    Nov 30, 2014
    Argue against his point then...
     
  11. BEATDOWNZ

    BEATDOWNZ Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,382
    1,045
    Nov 30, 2014
    Said nobody ever.
     
  12. senpai

    senpai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,188
    6,887
    May 18, 2021
    People like Wilder never learned their lessons. No matter what life will throw at them.

    Sad
     
    lordlosh likes this.
  13. nurological

    nurological Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,567
    10,766
    May 25, 2012
    Why? It's been done to death time and time again. Is Wilder a fraud? No. Is he an elite boxer? No. Does he have enough to beat most heavies? Yes as this division is full of slow plodders woth zero head movement made for Wilders right hand.
    Should he have a better CV? Yes.
     
    Wizbit1013 likes this.
  14. BEATDOWNZ

    BEATDOWNZ Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,382
    1,045
    Nov 30, 2014
    Why isn't Wilder a fraud?
     
  15. marcosqbit

    marcosqbit New Member Full Member

    49
    49
    Aug 14, 2022
    Wilder is a fraud because he and his promoters claim to be the world champion and the most dangerous heavyweight. This is complete nonsense and a lie. Because it's the same story as when two people apply for a job (boxing title), but one of them has a resume where he's obviously proven his skills, and the other overestimates his work experience in his resume and makes up everything he's accomplished. In the end, they both get the job, but the first person with a good resume is simply an honest worker. The other is just looking for shortcuts and lying about who he really is. And defending the title with Parker or Povetkin is a completely different story than defending it with Stiverne and Spilka. Wilder is a fraud.
     
    Mitch87 likes this.