For a start there will be 6 belts and the lineal title on the line. Not all belts carry the same prestige,plus if Fury is not retired he still has WBC belt Ring belt and lineal title. The lineal title having more history than all the other belts and goes back to 1885. Usyk beat one fighter to get his belts,Fury beat one fighter to get his belt. 50/50 is the numbers for the fight to happen,neither fighter deserves more than the other .
I think the loser (as a defeated champion) would deserve the chance to get his belt(s) back and how many other fights are there that would be as lucrative as Usyk vs Fury II with the possible exception of Fury vs AJ?
The only hard thing about making this fight is getting the Saudi's to pay up and Tyson picking his ring walk outfit. Warren & Arum haven't got the relationship Eddie has built with them but business is business.
Wasn't the Ring belt one of the two belts that AJ petulantly threw away during his pathetic meltdown? What was it doing there if it still belongs to Fury?
Usyk holds the Ring title, not Fury. There's no such thing as "lineal title". That's something Fury made up.
Saudi already have said that they want to host next Usyk fight, and 100% want to hold the Undisputed. I don't see anyone matching their offer, and it's their best bet in terms for money, and it's also a neutral venue.