AJ would still whoop Fury

It was a split decision that is a FACT whether you like it or not. I understand you don’t feel it should have been a split decision win for Usyk but that’s your opinion the FACTS are different.

 

I agree for the AJ part and so on, but that wasn't split decision, not even close. And it's not just his opinion, its everyone. And this time people speak wildly about it. Every single podcast, news, commentator, expert said that wasn't split decision and that was garbage.
Atlas said it the best. He gave AJ round 2 and then 8 and 9. AJ was just outboxed again.
I had similar score, but had one round between 3 and 8 even and 117-112 final.

 

That is people’s opinion but ultimately the judges who scored the fight officially had it close and1 gave it to AJ so it’s a split decision that is a FACT. Now I
can understand many don’t like it but it’s still a FACT that it was a split decision because the opinions that count is that of the judges.

 

This is everyone opinion, absolutely EVERYONE. Even from all of the UK commentators, Sky Sports, Dazn commentators, Chris Manix that score for DAZN, and every single one. From Boxing Experts to casuals. So when everyone agree something is wrong, then it's wrong.

It's clear as day that Glenn Feldman was paid off by Hearn. Everyone with 2 brain cells can see this. They also expected the UK judge to do his job, as he did it, cause the fight wasn't 115-113 for Usyk as well, it was wider.


But anyway while it not happen i hope AJ to win a fight by schooling his opponent, and then the judges to score the fight 115-113 for his opponent, and when you cry out loudly i will tell you, all that matter is the judges !!!


You get how pathetic that sound ? Just because a judge or judges score a fight, doesn't mean they score it right.


You should put your agenda aside when you try to have a normal discussion, without bias, otherwise just don't enter such discussion, cause it's pointless.

 

Don’t know what agenda you are referring to and I am pretty sure you have no proof Hearn paid of Glen Feldman either. I scored the fight for Usyk but an American judge scored it for AJ. 2 judges scored 115-113 so it was a close competitive fight the other had it 116-112.

 

Then you are delusional. There is a word objectivity, learn what its means.

 

Where is your evidence that Eddie Hearn paid off Feldman? Bet you don’t have it and you are just speculating.

 

Paid off or not the Judge was either stupid or a secret fan of Aj. There is no way he won 5 rounds let alone 7.

Olu, i tried to warn you. Joshua doesn't have it upstairs, and i tried to tell you Usyk would beat him again but you didn't want to listen because you love to back your fellow man.

Biased to the bone

 

This work both ways you know??? Where is yours that Hearn didn't pay him?
You are becoming a joke and no one will take you seriously.
Its your choice to go that way.
I have always been fair in my judgment and objectivity. Always like AJ and not agree with people that underrated him. He is still elite and top dog in the division, but there is no way in hell a professional will score 7-5 to AJ using whatever argument he can, this is just impossible. Just like that w**** of a transsexual scored thw fight 128-110 for Clenbuterolos. Corrupt f**** garbage that ruin the sport for so many people!!! And yeah they are clearly paid off. I don't belive in fairies.

 

You are alleging a crime specifically bribery and corruption by Hearn as if it’s an established fact. You have no proof or evidence. If indeed true I would support you 100% and say Hearn should be prosecuted. Disliking a person is not grounds to say they have committed a crime.

 

I'm just not biased or stupid person. Is Hearn personally bribe the ref though ? Most probably not, they have a scheme and knows how to do their stuff safely.
Was ref paid though, 50000%. Anyone with more than 2 brain cells knows this. It's up to you to decide which group you are getting into it.

 

Amazing how every time a judge renders a decision people don’t like the judge must be on the take. Take a step back and think how idiotic this sounds. Have you ever considered that is just the way a specific judge sees the fight?

 

You are bias are absolutely ridiculous. Get help bud.
Everyone and i mean every****** have Usyk clearly won that fight. People are calling for that scrub judge head and they want him arrested.
Even the UK commentators on Sky have said this wasn't a SD, and there wasn't a single case for AJ winning. Even biased Hearn said he has it 115-113 for Usyk, when it reality was 117-112, but still.
All the boxing expert, journalist, youtubers, past boxers, commentators, every single media, even the ones from the UK have said this was garbage card that was paid by either Hearn/DAZN to let AJ look good/stay relevant.


This is not an opinion, this is a fact.

One more similar post from you, and you will end up on my ignore list. It's not like you have much people to talk already, as most already mocking your post.
Learn to be objective or make discussion with yourself and that shadow guy that is beyond deluded.

This is the last from me to you. Next time i see such imbecile respond you are going into the ignore list.


It's one thing to have sympathy and have little bias for a certain fighter, it's another be beyond delusional and live in a fantasy world.

 

This is not about bias at all. You seem to forget I scored the fight for Usyk. 2 judges scored it 115-113 and the other 116-112 so the fight was actually closer than you think and perhaps you should talk to yourself and gain some objectivity. Anyone on here is entitled to put anyone else on Ignore. I have put a few idiots on Ignore myself. If the judges were paid Usyk would have lost the fight.

 

There is nothing close between 116-112 and 115-113 for the other fighter. Maybe you should go back to school and start learning math again.
And there is not a single way in hell that you can give AJ 7 round, not a f****** way. At the very best you can give him 5 rounds being a fanboy, but even AJ mom won't give him 7 rounds.

Check your UK media. Check Talksport Boxing and what Simon Jordan and other have said, that was putting money on AJ before the fight. They said that the SD is b.c. and 100% corruption.


Atlas said the same thing.
Give yourself some education buddy.

This content is protected

And NO even if you paid, there is some matches where you just can't score them for the "right" guy, because it's so obvious, it's ridiculous, aka Clenbuterolos vs Bivol, another fight where all of the 3 garbage's was paid off.


You should have shut at the time bud, because i will make you look even more stupid now.


How i know it was 5000% corruption, let me tell you how. Eddie Hearn try to remove the Ukrainian judge > Viktor Fesechko and change it with a UK one.
So you can GTFO straight away troll.

Yeah there is a corruption in boxing, and only a complete imbecile won't believe that. Or deluded guy like you and Shadow who support cheaters.


And yeah they are on a DAZN night, so they know they have to show bias if they wanna get chosen again, so they help with their card a bit. Some doing it so obviously, it's unreal. Some are clearly paid like Feldman, and some are dumb biased cause they are UK - aka Steve Gray.


Even the british commentators have the fight 5-1-1 after 7 round, then they gave AJ next 2, and the rest for Usyk. No one on his goddamn mind will give AJ the first and the 12 round. Only a complete blinded fanboy like you.


You keep trying to defend the corruption and shows your bias, so i'm done with you. I won't tolerate trolls to lose my precious time with their delusional view.

Good job, you are the next pearl on my ignore list.